Newman v. State

Decision Date22 October 1940
Docket Number28450.
Citation11 S.E.2d 248,63 Ga.App. 417
PartiesNEWMAN v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

J P. Dukes, of Pembroke, for plaintiff in error.

R L. Dawson, Sol. Gen., of Ludowici, for defendant in error.

MacINTYRE J.

1. "Where the only witness implicating the prisoners in the crime, was himself avowedly guilty, the corroborating circumstances necessary to dispense with another witness must be such as go to connect the prisoner with the offense, and *** it is not sufficient that the witness is corroborated as to the time, place and circumstances of the transaction, if there be nothing to show any connection of the prisoners therewith, except the statement of the accomplice." Childers v State, 52 Ga. 106, 107. Where one voluntarily confesses to the commission of a crime, though he have accomplices in the commission thereof, proof of the corpus delicti, independently of the confession, is sufficient to corroborate the confession and authorize a conviction of the confessor. But proof of the corpus delicti, even though independently of the confession or evidence of an accomplice, does not at all corroborate the testimony of the confessing accomplice so as to authorize a conviction of another accomplice who has not confessed. Voluntary confessions are sufficient to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice so as to support a verdict of guilty against a confessor and him only. Sanders v. State, 46 Ga.App. 175(1), 167 S.E. 207; Partee v. State, 67 Ga. 570.

2. "A conviction in a case of felony [hog stealing] is sustainable upon the testimony of a single witness, though an accomplice, when the same is corroborated by other testimony connecting the accused on trial with the perpetration of the crime, and tending to show his participation therein." McCrory v. State, 101 Ga. 779, 28 S.E. 921; Code, § 38-121.

3. But "it is not required that this corroboration shall of itself be sufficient to warrant a verdict, or that the testimony of the accomplice be corroborated in every material particular. *** Slight evidence from an extraneous source identifying the accused as a participator in the criminal act will be sufficient corroboration of the accomplice to support a verdict. *** The sufficiency of the corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice to produce conviction of the defendant's guilt is peculiarly a matter for the jury to determine. If the verdict is founded on slight...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Blakely v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1948
    ...v. State, 125 Ga. 270, 274, 54 S.E. 164, 166; Whaley v. State, 177 Ga. 757, 171 S.E. 209.' Newman v. State, 63 Ga.App. 417(2 & 3), 11 S.E.2d 248, 249. See also Roberts State, 55 Ga. 220(3); Mitchell v. State, 202 Ga. 247, 248, 42 S.E.2d 767. 'The facts relied upon as corroboration may be tr......
  • Potter v. State, 33459
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 11, 1951
    ...contrary to the evidence.' Hargrove v. State, 125 Ga. 270 , 274, 54 S.E. 164, 166; Whaley v. State, 177 Ga. 757, 171 S.E. 290.' Newman v. State, 63 Ga.App. 417(2, 3), 11 S.E.2d 248, 249. See also Roberts v. State, 55 Ga. 220(3); Mitchell v. State, 202 Ga. 247, 248, 42 S.E.2d 767. "The facts......
  • Blakely v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1948
    ...contrary to the evidence.' Hargrove v. State, 125 Ga. 270, 274, 54 S.E. 164, 166; Whaley v. State, 177 Ga. 757, 171 S.E. 290." Newman v. State, 63 Ga.App. 417(2 & 3), 11 S.E.2d 248, 249. See also Roberts v. State, 55 Ga. 220(3); Mitchell v. State, 202 Ga. 247, 248, 42 S.E.2d 767. "The facts......
  • Rewis v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 30, 1964
    ...the jury to determine.' Hargrove v. State, 125 Ga. 270, 274, 54 S.E. 164; Tootle v. State, 55 Ga.App. 865, 191 S.E. 876; Newman v. State, 63 Ga.App. 417, 11 S.E.2d 248. 'Voluntary confessions are sufficient to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice so as to support a verdict of guilty.'......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT