Nielsen v. Wessels
Decision Date | 15 November 1955 |
Docket Number | No. 48807,48807 |
Citation | 73 N.W.2d 83,247 Iowa 213 |
Parties | Arthur S. NIELSEN, Appellee, v. D. R. WESSELS and Ralph William Wessels, Appellants. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Haupert & Robertson, Marshalltown, for appellants.
C. H. Block, Grand Rapids, Mich., and Harris, Van Metre & Buckmaster, Waterloo, for appellee.
Plaintiff, a man twenty-nine years old, had been employed to pull house trailers behind a motor vehicle, identified by the U. S. Army as a quarter-ton jeep, rigged especially for that purpose, from the factory at Flint, Michigan, to various destinations. On this trip he was pulling a 31-foot Palace Coach house trailer, eight-feet wide, to Shoshone, Wyoming. On April 18, 1952, after driving since early morning, he stopped and slept a few hours just west of Waterloo, and then proceeded on his journey in the late afternoon, in a westerly direction on pavel Highway No. 20 to about seven miles west of Cedar Falls. He had just come over a hill in the highway and was passing down its western slope. It was a clear day with a light breeze. The pavement was clear and dry.
On the same day, the defendant, Ralph William Wessels, twenty-two years old, who lived at Aplington, Iowa, and was engaged in farming and general trucking, with a ton and a half truck took a load of hogs, about noon, for George Kappel, a farmer near Kesley, to the Rath Packing Company at Waterloo, arriving there about three o'clock in the afternoon. On his return home on Highway No. 20, with Mr. Kappel riding with him and approximately five or six miles west of Cedar Falls, he approached plaintiff's trailer unit and followed it for a mile and a half or two miles, on a rising grade, before he had an opportunity to pass it. Testifying for defendants, he said:
Kay Brainerd was a hitchhiker riding in the jeep with Nielsen. He was in the Armed Services at the time of the trial, and was not available as a witness. Mr. Kappel also was not a witness for either party.
Continuing in direct examination, the witness, Ralph Wessels, said: 'I first became acquainted with Kay Brainerd when he was lying there by the truck. When I first talked with Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Brainerd was up there on the road by the ambulance, at the time of my conversation with Mr. Nielsen, standing right there by me. Mr. Nielsen said, 'Well, now I wonder what they will do to me.''
'Q. Was there any mention made at that time to a horn? A. Yes. As Nielsen was lying there and Brainerd was there, and he (Brainerd) said, 'We couldn't have heard a horn anyway because the jeep made so much noise they could hardly hear themselves talk in the jeep.'' This remark of Brainerd after Ralph Wessels had asked the plaintiff if he didn't hear him honking his horn was also testified to in the cross-examination of Wessels. Plaintiff, in his rebuttal testimony said he did not hear Wessels ask him if he didn't hear his horn.
Asked on which side of the black line, in the middle of the pavement, the house trailer was when it first hit his truck, the witness replied that the trailer was approximately eight inches south of the black line, and that at the time of the impact the left dual wheels of the truck were over on the green grass and dirt of the shoulder.
On cross-examination, Ralph Wessels testified that the box on his truck was 14 feet long and 7 1/2 feet wide; and:
There were two witnesses for defendants who saw the collision. Charles Hartgrave a welding steamfitter in the Hormel Packing House, at Austin, Minnesota, with his wife and three children, and his brother-in-law, Paul Knapp, of Shell Rock, Iowa, in his car, had been attending a funeral at Parkersburg, and about 4:30 or 5:00 o'clock in the afternoon were proceeding eastward on Highway 20 toward Cedar Falls. Both Hartgrave and Knapp were in the front seat.
Hartgrave testified:
The witness gave like testimony on cross-examination. He said that he was about a quarter of a mile distant when he first observed the approaching vehicles, and he slowed up considerably, anticipating difficulty ahead. He did not hear a horn at any time. He said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dougherty v. Boyken
...Angle to give his opinion as to the point of impact. Hamdorf v. Corrie, 251 Iowa 896, 903, 101 N.W.2d 836, 840; Nielsen v. Wessels, 247 Iowa 213, 229, 73 N.W.2d 83, 92; Lucas v. Duccini, 258 Iowa 77, 82, 137 N.W.2d 634, 637; Mickelson v. Forney, 259 Iowa 91, 143 N.W.2d 390, 395. In all of t......
-
Hamdorf v. Corrie
...is the same point of impact he claimed in the testimony above set out. The situation here is similar to that in Nielsen v. Wessels, 247 Iowa 213, 229, 230, 73 N.W.2d 83, 92. In the Nielsen case the trial court refused to allow a highway patrolman to testify to the point of impact over objec......
-
Carmody v. Aho
...666, 265 P.2d 557; Ison v. Stewart, 105 Colo. 55, 94 P.2d 701; Ferguson v. Hurford, 132 Colo. 507, 290 P.2d 229; Nielsen v. Wessels, 247 Iowa 213, 73 N.W.2d 83; Beaudin v. Continental Baking Co., 94 N.H. 202, 50 A.2d 77; Thorstenson v. Degler, 15 Wash.2d 211, 129 P.2d 996. (There is an inte......
-
Gerberg v. Crosby
...8; Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. Cebrian, 1954, 122 Cal.App.2d 666, 265 P.2d 557; Een v. Consolidated Feightways, supra; Nielsen v. Wessels, 1955, 247 Iowa 213, 73 N.W.2d 83; Grant v. Clarke, 1956, 78 Idaho 412, 305 P.2d 752; 9C Blashfield, Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice 516, 517, § '......