Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Spence
Decision Date | 19 August 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A93A1715,A93A1715 |
Citation | 210 Ga.App. 284,435 S.E.2d 680 |
Parties | NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. SPENCE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Neely & Player, Edgar A. Neely, Jr., William C. Thompson and Laura A. Shaw, Atlanta, for appellants.
Agnew, Schlam & Bennett, Paul R. Bennett, Columbus and Leroy Langston, Atlanta, for appellee.
Plaintiff Spence's amended complaint states claims under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 ("FELA"), for negligent infliction of emotional distress and for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and under the Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 61 et seq., for requiring plaintiff to work two jobs for periods of time in excess of the maximum hours permitted. Defendants Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Central of Georgia Railway Company moved for summary judgment. A summary judgment was granted to defendant Central of Georgia Railway Company which had contended that plaintiff was not its employee while the motion for summary judgment of the remaining two defendants was denied. This appeal from the denial of their motion for summary judgment by defendants Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company follows the grant of their application for interlocutory appeal. Held:
We granted the application for interlocutory appeal in order to address contentions that the infliction of emotional distress claims are not viable FELA claims and that, if they are, plaintiff has failed to begin his action within the statute of limitation. However, under guidance from our recent decision in Bowers v. Estep, 204 Ga.App. 615, 617 (2), 420 S.E.2d 336, we find that we need not reach these issues as this appeal may properly be decided upon the same basis as our earlier decision, that is, without deciding whether a plaintiff may assert a claim under FELA for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, we hold that even if we allowed such a claim plaintiff Spence has failed to assert a claim that would entitle him to relief.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pierri v. Cingular Wireless, LLC
...bounds of decency, [so as to be] regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Spence, 210 Ga.App. 284, 435 S.E.2d 680, 681 (1993). In order for a plaintiff to meet the requisite level of outrageousness and egregiousness, "the conduct must b......
-
Ellis v. City of Fairburn, Ga.
...bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." Norfolk Southern Ry. v. Spence, 210 Ga.App. 284, 285, 435 S.E.2d 680 (1993) (citations omitted); Bowers v. Estep, 204 Ga.App. 615, 618, 420 S.E.2d 336, cert. denied, (Sept. 11, 1992). To p......
-
Johnson v. Citimortgage, Inc.
...bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." Norfolk So. Ry. Co. v. Spence, 210 Ga.App. 284, 435 S.E.2d 680 (1993). Here, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant intentionally or recklessly caused Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distre......
-
Price v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...Brands, 953 F.2d 1275, 1276 (11th Cir.1992) (claim denied); employers who make them work too hard, Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Spence, 210 Ga.App. 284, 285, 435 S.E.2d 680 (1993) (claim denied); employers so insensitive as to not hire them in the first place, Ward v. Papa's Pizza to Go, Inc......