Noriega v. Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York
| Decision Date | 15 May 2003 |
| Citation | 305 A.D.2d 220,761 N.Y.S.2d 18 |
| Parties | MANUEL NORIEGA, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Plaintiff died after the commencement of this medical malpractice action, and no substitution was made. The court rendered a conditional order dated October 6, 2000, directing substitution within 30 days of service of the copy of the order with notice of entry. The court warned that in the event the order was not complied with "the complaint may be dismissed." After plaintiff's personal representative failed to timely substitute and amend the caption, defendants separately moved and cross-moved for an order dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel opposed the motions and cross-moved for an order directing substitution. The court dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 1021.
The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting defendants' respective motions to dismiss the complaint and denying plaintiff's cross motion for substitution. A party's death "divests a court of jurisdiction to conduct proceedings in an action until a proper substitution has been made pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)" (Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Empls. Mut. Aid Socy., 112 AD2d 819, 820 [1985]; accord Faraone v National Academy of Tel. Arts & Sciences, 296 AD2d 349, 350 [2002]). When a timely substitution is not made, a court may not order dismissal without first ordering the persons interested in the decedent's estate to show cause why the action should not be dismissed (see CPLR 1021). Here, there was no order to show cause served upon an interested party (see Petty v Meadowbrook Distrib. Corp., 266 AD2d 88 [1999]). Furthermore, defendants' bare allegations of prejudice are insufficient to defeat a motion for substitution especially where, as here, the case is likely to turn mainly on medical records rather than witnesses' memories (see Jankie-Alli v Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., 262 AD2d 188 [1999]). Moreover, reversal of the order dismissing the action is in accord with the strong public policy of this State that, in the absence of prejudice, a matter should be disposed of on its merits (see Penn v American Airlines, 192 AD2d 385, 386 [1993]; Bauer v Claridge At Park Place, 181 AD2d 566, 567 [1992]).
We have considered and rejected the balance of defendants' contentions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Public Adm'r v. Levine
...the plaintiff's failure to secure substitution in a timely fashion resulted in undue prejudice (Noriega v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y., 305 A.D.2d 220, 221, 761 N.Y.S.2d 18 [1st Dept.2003] ). With regard to whether the Public Administrator in this case has demonstrated a reasonable e......
-
Neuman v. Neumann
...839, 840, 821 N.Y.S.2d 120; Giroux v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 16 A.D.3d 1068, 1069, 791 N.Y.S.2d 769; Noriega v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y., 305 A.D.2d 220, 221, 761 N.Y.S.2d 18; Gonzalez v. Ford Motor Co., 295 A.D.2d 474, 475, 744 N.Y.S.2d 468). However, where the causes of action asser......
-
Largo-Chicaiza v. Westchester Scaffold Equip. Corp.
...329, 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94; Noriega v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y., 305 A.D.2d 220, 221, 761 N.Y.S.2d 18). Moreover, the third-party action has potential merit, given the Court of Appeals' opinion reinstating ......
-
Williams v. Hertz Vehicles, LLC
...the persons interested in the decedent's estate to show cause why the action should not be dismissed (CPLR 1021; Noriega v. Presbyterian Hospital, 305 A.D.2d 220 [1st Dept. 2003]; see also Velez v. New York Presbyterian Hosp., 145 A.D.3d 632 [1st Dept. 2016]). "The determination of reasonab......