Norman v. State, 89-204
| Decision Date | 25 January 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-204,89-204 |
| Citation | 555 So.2d 1316 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D268 James Arnold NORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fleming Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robin A. Compton, Certified Legal Intern, Daytona Beach, for appellee.
James Arnold Norman was convicted of committing a sexual battery when the victim was physically helpless to resist. 1 Because there is no evidence that the victim was physically helpless as that term is statutorily defined, we reverse.
Section 794.011(1)(e) provides:
The term "physically helpless" means that a person is unconscious, asleep, or for any other reason physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act.
In the instant case, the victim was able to communicate her unwillingness, and did so both before and during the commission of the sexual battery. Compare Perez v. State, 479 So.2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) ().
Norman further objects that the following jury instruction improperly led the jury to conclude that Norman's inconsistent statements revealed HIS consciousness of guilt:
The court further instructs you that inconsistent exculpatory statements can be used to affirmatively show consciousness of guilty and unlawful intent.
This objection is without merit. See Johnson v. State, 465 So.2d 499 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 186, 88 L.Ed.2d 155 (1985).
Finally, the parties agree that the trial court erred in assessing costs against Norman without notice or an opportunity to be heard. However, upon remand, the trial court may consider the assessment of costs following proper notice and hearing. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988).
Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded for resentencing for the lesser included offense of sexual battery in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
1 § 794.011(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1987).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Coley v. State
...Gould v. State, 577 So.2d at 1305, aff'g in part, quashing in part, 558 So.2d 481, 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Norman v. State, 555 So.2d 1316, 1317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Davis v. State, 538 So.2d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 544 So.2d 201 to resist," is a misnomer. The phrase suggests......
-
State v. Elkin
...Johnson v. State, 465 So.2d 499, 504 (Fla.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 186, 88 L.Ed.2d 155 (1985). See Norman v. State, 555 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); P.N. v. State, 443 So.2d 193, 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Whether defendant's sworn statement was exculpatory and self-serving ......
-
Bullington v. State
...period is an insufficient basis to support a finding that the victim was physically helpless to resist. See Norman v. State, 555 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (where victim was able to communicate unwillingness prior to and during sexual battery, she was not physically helpless to In respo......
-
State v. Sedia
...when they are able to communicate their unwillingness to participate in sexual intercourse, even if otherwise helpless. Norman v. State, 555 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 5th DCA1990). In this case, even though the patient was not unconscious or asleep, it is Here, as in Perez, a jury could conclude tha......