Norstrom v. State

Decision Date07 April 1993
Docket NumberNo. 89-1966,89-1966
Citation616 So.2d 592
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D902 Eric C. NORSTROM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Michael Salnick of Law Offices of Michael Salnick, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reconsider this appeal in accordance with the supreme court's opinion in State v. Norstrom, 613 So.2d 437 (Fla.1993). In doing so, we have reviewed all issues not resolved by our opinion in Norstrom v. State, 587 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We find error only as to one sentencing issue. Appellant should not have been convicted of both reckless driving and vehicular homicide. Cf. Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), superseded in part by the 1988 amendment to section 775.021(4) of the Florida Statutes; State v. Barritt, 531 So.2d 338 (Fla.1988).

As to all other issues, we affirm. We remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence in accordance with this opinion.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT