North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, s. AP-37

Decision Date15 July 1983
Docket NumberNos. AP-37,AQ-182,s. AP-37
Citation436 So.2d 954
PartiesNORTH AMERICAN PUBLICATIONS, INC., and Neighbor Newspaper, Petitioner, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Office of the Comptroller, State of Florida, Respondents, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

C. Timothy Corcoran, III and Robert W. Courtney of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner, appellant.

Thomas L. Barnhart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondents, appellees.

JOANOS, Judge.

These consolidated appeals involve two administrative orders, one a final order of the Division of Administrative Hearings determining that Rule 12A-1.08, Fla.Admin.Code, is valid, and the other a final order of the Office of the Comptroller denying a tax refund. Appellant raises the following issues:

(I) Whether Rule 12A-1.08, Fla.Admin.Code is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority or an erroneous interpretation of Section 212.08(6), Fla.Stat., and the denial of appellant's refund was erroneous as based on an invalid rule?

(II) Whether the discriminatory denial of a sales tax exemption violates appellant's rights of equal protection and freedom of the press under the United States and Florida Constitutions?

Appellant publishes the "Neighbor," a publication which is distributed free of charge in the metropolitan area of Tampa. Appellant sought an exemption from the sales tax imposed on items used in the production and distribution of the "Neighbor," specifically paper, ink, and plastic bags. The exemption was denied because the "Neighbor" did not meet the criteria to be classified as a newspaper under Rule 12A-1.08, Fla.Admin.Code, which implements Section 212.08(6). Specifically, appellant did not meet the criteria set forth in Rule 12A-1.08(3)(d) and (4). 1 Appellant therefore sought to have Rule 12A-1.08 declared invalid in a proceeding pursuant to Section 120.56, Florida Statutes. In a separate proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, appellant sought a refund of the tax, which was paid under protest. The outcome of those hearings was that the rule was determined to be a valid exercise of delegated legislative authority, and the refund was denied.

As to the first issue, we are not persuaded that the instant case is distinguishable from two previous cases which have reviewed the question of the validity of Rule 12A-1.08, in particular, subparagraphs (3)(d) and (4) of that rule, and determined that the administrative construction of Section 212.08(6) found in Rule 12A-1.08 is not clearly erroneous or unauthorized. See Boca Raton Publishing Co. v. Department of Revenue, 413 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and Department of Revenue v. Skop, 383 So.2d 678 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Therefore we affirm on issue I upon the authority of those cases.

Regarding issue II, we disagree with appellant's assertion in the statement of the issue that the denial of the tax exemption to appellant was discriminatory. Appellant relies heavily on the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Minneapolis Star and Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575, 103 S.Ct. 1365, 75 L.Ed.2d 295 (1983) contending that the situation determined in that case to violate the First Amendment, particularly insofar as the tax involved was found to single out a small group of newspapers, is indistinguishable from the present case. In the present case, in contrast to Minneapolis Star, appellant is subject to a sales tax which is widely applicable to businesses of all kinds as part of the general scheme of sales and use taxes prescribed in Chapter 212, Florida...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Campus Communications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, State of Fla.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1985
    ...exercise of delegated legislative authority, holding that it was bound to follow its decision in North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 436 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 449 So.2d 265 (Fla.1984), wherein the court had held the rule valid. However, the co......
  • Department of Revenue v. Campus Communications, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 1984
    ...an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Based on this court's recent holding in North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 436 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 449 So.2d 265 (Fla.1984), that Rule 12A-1.08(3)(d) and (4) is a valid exercise of deleg......
  • Humhosco, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, AZ-403
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1985
    ...must show that the agency's interpretation of the statute is clearly erroneous or unauthorized. North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 436 So.2d 954, 955 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The agency's interpretation of the term "uniform methodology" is not clearly erroneous or unaut......
  • North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1984
    ...265 North American Publications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue NO. 64282 Supreme Court of Florida. APR 11, 1984 Appeal From: 1st DCA 436 So.2d 954 Pet. for rev. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT