Nowak v. Nowak
| Decision Date | 13 July 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-2360,88-2360 |
| Citation | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1670,546 So.2d 123 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1670 Martin W. NOWAK, Appellant, v. Donna C. NOWAK, n/k/a Donna C. Fugelstad, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Albert H. Mickler, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Donald W. Matthews of Matthews, Black & Stone, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.
This cause is before us on appeal from an order granting a mother's motion for modification of visitation and denying a father's motion for contempt. In his order, the trial judge stated:
The Court hearing the testimony of the parties, and the child's psychological therapist, Berlin Jones, and speaking to the child in private without the parties or counsel present, and considering the evidence, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
l. The Husband's motion for contempt is denied.
2. The Wife's motion for the limitation of visitation is granted, and the father henceforth shall have no right to visitation with the minor child, MARTIN R. NOWAK.
The order makes no findings of fact nor does it show the necessity for a modification of visitation rights. The record suggests that the judge relied primarily upon his unrecorded in camera interview with the child in terminating visitation, rather than on record evidence.
Due process considerations require the party seeking modification of visitation demonstrate by record evidence that there has been a material change in circumstances and modification is required to protect the child's best interests. See French v. French, 452 So.2d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Gavronsky v. Gavronsky, 403 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Teta v. Teta, 297 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). In Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), the court reversed the trial court's order summarily setting aside a previous order awarding the father custody after denying the father the opportunity to present any further evidence and holding a private, unreported conference with the children.
We distinguish Walker-Seaman v. Garwood, 456 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), wherein parties stipulated to an unrecorded in camera interview that formed the basis for modification of custody. 1 The parties herein did not stipulate to the interview but, rather, objected to the absence of counsel or a court reporter and the court's refusal to provide an appraisal of the interview.
The record does not establish the necessary predicate for modification of visitation, and the cause must be remanded...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ynclan v. The Honorable Paul K. Woodward
...over objection of either party); In re Marriage of Slayton, 86 Cal.App.4th 653, 659, 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 (2001); Nowak v. Nowak, 546 So.2d 123, 124 (Fla.App.1989); Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So.2d 1156,(Fla.App.1984); Cunningham v. Cunningham, 787 N.E.2d 930, 937 (Ind.App.2003); Cox v. Cox, see note......
-
Molloy v. Molloy
...77, 986 S.W.2d 890 (1999); In re Katrina L., 200 Cal.App.3d 1288, 247 Cal.Rptr. 754 (1988); Colo. Rev. Stat. XX-XX-XXX; Nowak v. Nowak, 546 So.2d 123 (Fla.App., 1989); King v. Scarborough, 231 Ga. 747, 204 S.E.2d 174 (1974); Strain v. Strain, 95 Idaho 904, 523 P.2d 36 (1974); Gingrey v. Lam......
-
Haase v. Haase
...the procedural rights of the parents cannot be sustained unless a record of the evidence received is prepared. See Nowak v. Nowak, 546 So.2d 123, 124 (Fla.App.1989)(reversing for failure to provide record of in camera proceeding). Accordingly, when an in camera interview is conducted by the......
-
Talarico v. Talarico
...suggests that the judge relied primarily upon [the] in camera interview with the child[ren]" in modifying custody.3 Nowak v. Nowak, 546 So. 2d 123, 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Under these circumstances, "[t]he divulging of information ascertained from the in camera interview ... is required by......