Nutt v. Mills Co.

Decision Date20 September 1883
Citation16 N.W. 536,61 Iowa 754
PartiesNUTT v. MILLS CO.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Pottawattamie district court.

The plaintiff avers that the defendant constructed a ditch and embankment along his land; that the defendant was guilty of negligence in the construction, and by reason thereof the plaintiff's land has been overflowed, and he has sustained injury. The defendant demurred to the petition and the demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff electing to stand upon his petition, judgment was rendered against him for costs. He appeals.P. P. Kelley and J. H. Keatley, for appellant.

Hale & Stone and Watkins & Williams, for appellee.

ADAMS, J.

The defendant is what is called a quasi corporation. Such corporations are not ordinarily liable for negligence. Kincaid v. Hardin Co. 53 Iowa, 430; [S. C. 5 N. W. REP. 589.] The precise question before us was determined in Green v. Harrison Co. ante, 136. The case of Wilson v. Jefferson Co. 13 Iowa, 181, and other cases respecting county bridges, it was held did not apply.

In our opinion the petition did not show a cause of action, and the demurrer was properly sustained. Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Shirkey v. Keokuk County
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1937
    ... ... 129, 194 N.W. 245; Lane v. Dist. Tp. of ... Woodbury, 58 Iowa 462, 12 N.W. 478; Green v ... Harrison County, 61 Iowa 311, 16 N.W. 136; Nutt v ... Mills County, 61 Iowa 754, 16 N.W. 536; Lindley v ... Polk County, 84 Iowa 308, 50 N.W. 975; Dashner v ... Mills County, 88 Iowa ... ...
  • State v. Hoffman
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1938
  • Nutt v. Mills County
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1883

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT