Old Colony R. Co. v. Slavens

Decision Date04 January 1889
Citation148 Mass. 363,19 N.E. 372
PartiesOLD COLONY R. CO. v. SLAVENS et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

January 4, 1889

HEADNOTES

COUNSEL

Patton & Blair, for defendants.

J.H. Benton, Jr., for plaintiff.

OPINION

C. ALLEN, J.

The verdict establishes it as a fact that the defendants might have done the work of transferring and loading the mail bags, without obstructing the sidewalk as it was obstructed on the occasion of the injury to Amory. The plaintiff's regulations and provisions did not require such obstruction, and the only question before us is whether, assuming this as a fact, the plaintiff was entitled to recover; and we think the plaintiff and the defendants were not, as to each other, in pari delicto. The plaintiff was held liable to Amory, because bound to keep the sidewalk reasonably safe. But the ground of the present action is that the defendants by their negligent act exposed the plaintiff to this liability. The plaintiff's neglect to keep the sidewalk safe did not make the plaintiff a joint wrong-doer with the defendants, in any such sense as to prevent the plaintiff from recovering. Churchill v. Holt, 131 Mass. 67, 127 Mass. 165; Gray v. Gas-Light Co., 114 Mass. 149; Woburn v. Railroad Co., 109 Mass. 283; West Boylston v. Mason, 102 Mass. 341; Milford v. Holbrook, 9 Allen, 17, 23.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Story v. Concord & M. R. R.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • July 27, 1900
    ...negligence, if, as to the latter, he is without fault Nashua Iron & Steel Co. v. Worcester & N. Railroad Co., supra; Railroad Co. v. Slavens, 148 Mass. 363, 19 N. E. 372. Whether, under the circumstances, there would be a right of recovery of one corporation from the other, it is not necess......
  • City of Lewiston v. Isaman
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • April 14, 1911
    ... ... 16 Am. St. 250, 22 N.E. 14, 4 L. R. A. 721; Farwell v ... Becker, 129 Ill. 261, 16 Am. St. 267, 21 N.E. 792, 6 L ... R. A. 400; Old Colony Ry. Co. v. Slavens, 148 Mass ... 363, 12 Am. St. 558, 19 N.E. 372; Sherwood v ... Dunbar, 6 Cal. 53; Richter v. Henningsan, 110 ... Cal ... ...
  • Stewart v. Roy Bros. Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1970
    ...the unsafe condition.' See Lowell v. Boston & Lowell R. R., 23 Pick. 24, 31--35; Churchill v. Holt, 127 Mass. 165; Old Colony R. R. v. Slavens, 148 Mass. 363, 366, 19 N.E. 372; Boston v. Coon, 175 Mass. 283, 56 N.E. 287; Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. Kendall, 178 Mass. 232, 59 N.E. 657;......
  • Rea v. Checker Taxi Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1930
    ...acting by its employee, the driver of the taxicab, were not, as to each other, in pari delicto. Cf. Old Colony Railroad v. Slavens, 148 Mass. 363, 366, 19 N. E. 372,12 Am. St. Rep. 558;Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 218 Mass. 582, 584, 106 N. E. 680. Exceptions ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT