One 1976 American Jeep Identification No. J6F83EA002081, Tag FEF-421 v. State ex rel. City of Largo, for Use and Ben. of Largo Police Dept., FEF-421

• Decision Date: 02 March 1983
• Docket Number: No. 82-845,FEF-421,82-845
• Citation: 427 So.2d 364
• Parties: ONE 1976 AMERICAN JEEP IDENTIFICATION NO. J6F83EA002081, TAG, and Robert W. Montgomery, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, ex rel. CITY OF LARGO, For the Use and Benefit of the LARGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellees.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

Page 364

427 So.2d 364

ONE 1976 AMERICAN JEEP IDENTIFICATION NO. J6F83EA002081, TAG FEF-421, and Robert W. Montgomery, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, ex rel. CITY OF LARGO, For the Use and Benefit of the LARGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellees.

No. 82-845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida,

Second District.

March 2, 1983.

Ky M. Koch of Bauer & Koch, Clearwater, for appellants.

James T. Russell, State Atty., and C. Marie King, Asst. State Atty., Clearwater, for appellees.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant Robert Montgomery seeks reversal of an order of forfeiture of his 1976 American Motors Jeep. The state claimed that the vehicle had been used to aid in the commission of a felony and was subject to forfeiture as contraband under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.

The facts leading to the seizure of Montgomery's jeep are not disputed. Montgomery was arrested and charged with burglary. Following his arrest, Montgomery voluntarily admitted to the police that he and a codefendant had entered a business owned by their employer for the purpose of stealing items. Montgomery further admitted that he drove to the scene of the burglary in his jeep and used it to transport the property taken in the burglary. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court made a factual finding that the jeep had been used to aid or abet in the commission of grand theft and ordered the vehicle forfeited.

In order to understand Montgomery's argument, it is necessary to set forth in detail the pertinent provisions of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. ¹

Montgomery argues that the Act does not apply to a motor vehicle used in the course of grand theft. He suggests that section 932.703(1), Florida Statutes (1981), is the enabling portion of the Act and argues that the following language of that section authorizes forfeiture of a vehicle only when it contains a contraband article of the type defined in section 932.701(2)(a)-(d):

In any incident in which possession of any contraband article defined in s. 932.701(2)(a)-(d) constitutes a felony, the ... motor vehicle, ... in or on which such contraband article is located at the time of seizure shall be contraband subject to forfeiture.

He reasons that since this provision does not refer to contraband articles as defined in section 932.701(2)(e), his jeep cannot be forfeited. We disagree.

Section 932.701(2)(e) defines a contraband article as:

Any personal property, including, but not limited to, any item, object, tool, substance, device, weapon, machine, vehicle of any kind, money, securities, or currency, which has been or is actually employed as an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of, any felony. (Emphasis added.)

Section 932.702(4) makes it unlawful to conceal or possess any contraband article. The first sentence of section 932.703(1) provides for the seizure of any contraband article involved in violation of any provision of section 932.702. The second sentence provides that title to contraband articles used in violation of section 932.702 should vest in the state upon seizure, "subject only to perfection of title, rights and interests in accordance with this act." Section 932.704 outlines the procedure for the forfeiture of any contraband article used in violation of the provisions of the law dealing with contraband.

When the Act is read as a whole, it is clear that a vehicle used in "aiding or abetting in the commission of any felony" is a "contraband article" which is properly subject to forfeiture. The sentence relied upon by Montgomery as limiting forfeiture is merely cumulative of the other provisions of the Act. ² Since Montgomery used his jeep to aid in the commission of the felony of grand theft, it was subject to forfeiture.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, J., and NELSON, WILLIAM J., Associate Judge, concur.

1 932.701 Short title; definition of "contraband article".--

(1) Sections 932.701-932.704 shall be known and may be cited as the "Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act."

(2) As used in ss. 932.701-932.704, "contraband article" means:

(a) Any controlled substance as defined in chapter 893 or any substance, device, paraphernalia, or currency or other means of exchange which has been, is being, or is intended to be used in violation of any provision of chapter 893.

(b) Any gambling paraphernalia, lottery tickets, money, and currency used or intended to be used in the violation of the gambling laws of the state.

(c) Any equipment, liquid or solid, which is being used or intended to be used in violation of the beverage or tobacco laws of the state.

(d) Any motor fuel upon which the motor fuel tax has not been paid as required by law.

(e) Any personal property, including, but not limited to, any item, object, tool, substance, device, weapon, machine, vehicle of any kind, money, securities, or currency, which has been or is actually employed as an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of, any felony.

...