Orange City Water Co. v. Barkley, AO-52

Decision Date07 June 1983
Docket NumberNo. AO-52,AO-52
Citation432 So.2d 698
PartiesORANGE CITY WATER COMPANY and Sentry Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Rufus F. BARKLEY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Wendell J. Kiser of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for appellants.

Frank Marriott, Jr., of Cameron, Marriott, Walsh & Hodges, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

NIMMONS, Judge.

The employer/carrier (E/C) appeals from an order finding E/C liable for additional temporary total disability benefits by reason of the onset of additional severe symptoms related to a back injury sustained on September 17, 1980, by claimant Barkley while employed by Orange City Water Company. There was competent substantial evidence, both medical and lay, supporting the deputy's finding that Barkley's back condition continued to be symptomatic after reaching MMI from the original accident and that the additional severe symptoms which he experienced commencing on April 10, 1982, while working at a fish market for another employer were not the result of a new accident but rather, as stated by the deputy, "the result of a continuation of the same injury process begun on September 17, 1980." Where a deputy commissioner makes findings and conclusions based upon competent substantial evidence, such findings will be sustained if permitted by any view of the evidence and its permissible inferences. Gomez v. Steinberg Neckwear, 424 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

LARRY G. SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1993
    ...judge's findings must be sustained if permitted by any view of the evidence and its permissible inferences. Orange City Water Co. v. Barkley, 432 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The JCC as finder of fact is not required to accept an opinion which is not supported by the facts of record. Mall......
  • Delgado v. Blanco & Sons Catering, 91-1850
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 1992
    ...judge's findings must be sustained if permitted by any view of the evidence and its permissible inferences. Orange City Water Co. v. Barkley, 432 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). In this case the judge's decision to afford more weight to the evidence and inferences indicating that Mr. Delgado......
  • Prather v. Process Systems
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 2004
    ...permissible inferences. Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dep't, 625 So.2d 868, 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (citing Orange City Water Co. v. Barkley, 432 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)). "The [JCC], as the trier of fact, has the right to determine the credibility of witnesses, including the claimant......
  • Orlando Waste Paper Co. v. Meadows
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 1984
    ...and the inferences derivable therefrom, must be upheld if permitted by any reasonable view of the evidence. Orange City Water Co. v. Barkley, 432 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Contrary to the majority's opinion, the claimant's rebuttal evidence was not confined to the "mere conclusion" by ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT