Oren v. General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.

Decision Date01 June 1965
Docket NumberNo. 64-984,64-984
Citation175 So.2d 581
PartiesBillie June OREN, Administratrix of the Estate of Juanita Hicks, Deceased, and Billie June Oren, Administratrix of the Estate of Jesse D. Hicks, Deceased, Appellant, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Ltd., a foreign corporation, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Gladys Irene White and Samuel D. Wallace, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam and Henry Burnett, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

Juanita Hicks was an insured under a policy containing an uninsured motorist clause. While riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by her husband, Jesse D. Hicks, an accident occurred with Charles D. Bradley, an uninsured motorist. Subsequently both Juanita and Jesse expired and appellant was appointed administratrix of both estates. Appellant, as administratrix, instituted separate suits and recovered judgments against Bradley. The suits were filed and judgment obtained without the consent of the insurer.

The insurance policy contained, in part, the following provisions under the Uninsured Motorists clause:

* * *

* * *

'Exclusions

'This policy does not apply * * *

* * *

* * *

'(b) To bodily injury to an insured, or care or loss of services recoverable by an insured, with respect to which such insured, his legal representative or any person entitled to payment under this coverage shall, without written consent of the company, make any settlement with or prosecute to judgment any action against any person or organization who may be legally liable therefor; (Emphasis added)'

* * *

* * *

The administratrix, after obtaining the judgments, filed a demand for arbitration under the policy.

Appellee (insurer) instituted the present suit requesting that the administratrix be enjoined from proceeding with any claim against it under the policy, due to a violation of the policy terms. A summary final decree was issued in favor of the insurer, and the administratrix appealed. We agree with this decision of the trial court.

The exclusion clause in the contract was specific, clear and unambiguous. It provided that the policy did not apply where the insured or his legal representative made a settlement or obtained a judgment against a person who might be liable, without the written consent of the insurer. It is clear that these terms were violated when suit was filed and judgment obtained without the written consent of the insurer.

The general rules applicable are set forth in Rigel v. National Casualty Company, Fla.1954, 76 So.2d 285, where Justice Thomas for the court s...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Kisling v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 17, 1966
    ...is ours.) Other courts have found the language of the consent exclusion to be clear and unambiguous [Oren v. General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., Fla.App., 175 So.2d 581, 582 (1965); Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kowalski, 233 Cal.App.2d 607, 43 Cal.Rptr. 843, 845-846 (1965)], and so do we. ......
  • Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Butler, 46143
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 21, 1975
    ...Borthwick, 177 So.2d 687 (Fla.App.1, 1965); Rakoff v. World Insurance Co., 191 So.2d 476 (Fla.App.3, 1966); Oren v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corp., 175 So.2d 581 (Fla.App.3, 1965); Winter Garden Ornamental Nursery, Inc. v. Cappleman, 201 So.2d 479 (Fla.App.4, 1967); and Grav......
  • Charest v. Union Mut. Ins. Co. of Providence
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 28, 1973
    ...the insurer forfeited his uninsured motorist coverage in accordance with the terms of the policy. See Oren v. General Acc. Fire and Life Assur. Corp., 175 So.2d 581, 582 (Fla.App.1965). There is no allegation of fraud or of arbitrary refusal of consent. The plaintiff relies on the fact that......
  • State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Rossini
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 1971
    ...waiver of this provision. E.g. Kisling v. M.F.A. Mutual Insurance Company, 399 S.W.2d 245 (Mo.App.1966); Oren v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Co., 175 So.2d 581 (Fla.App.1965).4 See Widiss, Uninsured Motorist Coverage, § ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT