Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc., 78-1139

Decision Date15 December 1978
Docket NumberNo. 78-1139,78-1139
Citation365 So.2d 425
PartiesSteven F. OSBORNE, Appellant, v. DELTA MAINTENANCE AND WELDING, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

C. Daniel Akes, Lakeland, for appellant.

Robert S. Edwards of Edwards, Sawyer & White, Plant City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Steven F. Osborne appeals from an order dismissing his third amended complaint with prejudice. We reverse.

Osborne was employed by appellee Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc. Delta offered a payroll deduction plan whereby its employees would be covered by health insurance. Osborne accepted and was enrolled in this plan, but after being hospitalized for an appendicitis attack, he discovered that the health insurance had been cancelled because Delta had not paid the premium. Delta had, however, continued to make payroll deductions from Osborne's pay for the insurance.

Osborne filed suit against Delta seeking compensatory and punitive damages of over $2,500. Thereafter Osborne voluntarily amended the complaint twice. Delta moved to dismiss the second amended complaint because Osborne had failed to allege a legal remedy entitling him to damages and had failed to allege sufficient facts substantiating conversion. After hearing this motion the trial judge dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Thereafter Osborne filed his third amended complaint. Delta again moved to dismiss, this time asserting that Osborne had failed to allege a cause of action based upon fraud or misrepresentation. After a hearing, the trial court dismissed Osborne's third amended complaint with prejudice. Osborne appeals from this order.

Unfortunately, we do not know the judge's reason for dismissing with prejudice because the hearing on the last motion to dismiss was not reported. An examination of the complaint leads us to conclude that it does state a cause of action for breach of contract. In its brief, Delta has suggested that the actual damages arising from its alleged failure to pay insurance premiums are below the jurisdictional amount for the circuit court. There are no allegations in the complaint to support that contention and we may not consider it. Even if that were true, a better course of action would have been for the trial judge to transfer the action to county court rather than to dismiss it with prejudice. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.060(a).

We do agree that the third amended complaint does not state a cause of action for fraud. The elements of fraud are: 1) a false statement of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Sanders v. Robinson Humphrey/American Exp., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • March 28, 1986
    ...(Ala.1982), while in Florida the defendant must knowingly and purposefully make a false statement, see Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc., 365 So.2d 425, 427 (Fla.App.1978). In Mississippi, Ohio, South Carolina, and Tennessee, a plaintiff must prove that he had the right to rely......
  • Chakra 5, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 22, 2018
    ...Park, LLC v. City of Hialeah, 218 So.3d 452, 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (alterations in original) (quoting Osborne v. Delta Maint. & Welding, Inc., 365 So.2d 425, 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) ...
  • P.C.B. Partnership v. City of Largo
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 1989
    ...should not be denied unless the privilege has been abused or the complaint is clearly not amendable. Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc., 365 So.2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In this case, it is unclear whether appellant can state a cause of action for return of the money, especiall......
  • New River Yachting Center, Inc. v. Bacchiocchi
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 14, 1981
    ...should not be denied unless the privilege has been abused or the complaint is clearly not amendable. Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, 365 So.2d 425 (Fla. 2nd D.C.A. 1978). This determination should be governed by a policy favoring resolution of cases on their merits, unless the pri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Fraud
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • April 1, 2022
    ...So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1995). 5. Perry v. Cosgrove , 464 So.2d 664, 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). 6. Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc. , 365 So.2d 425, 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). 7. C & J Sapp Publishing Co. v. Tandy Corp. , 585 So.2d 290, 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). §8:10.1.3 Elements of Cause o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT