Owen v. State, 66973
Decision Date | 15 June 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 66973,66973 |
Citation | 656 S.W.2d 458 |
Parties | Lewis Edell OWEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal is taken from a conviction for voluntary manslaughter. The jury assessed punishment at twenty years.
In a single ground of error appellant contends the court erred in overruling his motion for mistrial "following the prosecutor's comments on the failure of the defendant to testify."
At the punishment stage of the trial the prosecutor argued:
Counsel for appellant objected to the argument as being a comment on appellant's failure to testify at the second phase of the trial. The objection was sustained and the jury was instructed to disregard the comments of the prosecutor. Appellant's motion for mistrial was overruled by the court.
The prosecutor continued with his argument as follows:
Counsel for appellant again objected, "This is clearly a second comment upon his failure to testify." The court sustained the objection, instructed the jury to disregard and overruled appellant's motion for a mistrial.
Art. 38.08, V.A.C.C.P., provides as follows:
"Any defendant in a criminal action shall be permitted to testify in his own behalf therein, but the failure of any defendant to so testify shall not be taken as a circumstance against him, nor shall the same be alluded to or commented on by counsel in the cause."
A prosecutor's comment on a defendant's failure to testify offends both our State and Federal Constitutions. Nickens v. State, 604 S.W.2d 101 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Pollard v. State, 552 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). The language of such a comment must be either manifestly intended, or of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the defendant's failure to testify. Griffin v. State, 554 S.W.2d 688 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Hicks v. State, 525 S.W.2d 177 (Tex.Cr.App.1975). If the remark complained of called the jury's attention to the absence of evidence that only the testimony from the appellant could supply, the conviction must be reversed. Myers v. State, 573 S.W.2d 19 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).
The prohibition against a comment on the defendant's failure to testify is mandatory and the adverse effect of any reference to the accused's failure to testify is not generally cured by an instruction to the jury. Johnson v. State, 611 S.W.2d 649 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Overstreet v. State, 470 S.W.2d 653 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).
The State urges that it was not error for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lester v. State
...the prosecutor could comment on the defendant's failure to testify and express remorse during the sentencing phase. Owen v. State, 656 S.W.2d 458, 458-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). However, Lester cites no Mississippi authority in support of his contention. Because Lester did testify during the g......
-
Jackson v. State
...See also Lesko, 925 F.2d at 1544-45 (defendant didn't have the "common decency to say I'm sorry for what I did."); Owen v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 656 S.W.2d 458, 459 (1983) (defendant testified at trial but not sentencing hearing; prosecutor's remarks about defendant's failure to say he was so......
-
Jones v. State
...overruled on other grounds, Garcia v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.4th 953, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 858, 928 P.2d 572 (1997). 47. Owen v. Texas, 656 S.W.2d 458, 460 (Tex. Crim.App.1983). 48. Id. at 49. Fair v. State, 245 Ga. 868, 873, 268 S.E.2d 316 (1980)(when defendant admits guilt); Isaacs v. State, 25......
-
Tenner v. State
...right to remain silent. Todd v. State, 598 S.W.2d 286, 294 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Tenner's reliance on the case of Owen v. State, 656 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.Crim.App.1983) is misplaced, because in that case the prosecutor's comment was directly related to the accused's failure to testify. We overrul......