Pagano v. State, 58190

Decision Date03 July 1980
Docket NumberNo. 58190,58190
Citation387 So.2d 349
PartiesGiovanni Armando PAGANO, etc., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Howard M. Zeidwig, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ALDERMAN, Justice.

This cause is before us on direct appeal from an order of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of Florida's corruption by threat against public servant statute and affirming defendant's conviction for the "attempted" violation of this statute. We have jurisdiction even though it is unnecessary to the determination of this cause for us to pass upon the constitutional question. P.C. Lissenden Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County, 116 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1959).

Defendant was charged by information with corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1977) for allegedly threatening harm to a police officer and his family for the purpose of avoiding arrest. After trial by jury, he was found guilty of attempted corruption by threat, as a lesser included offense of the crime charged.

The determinative issue is whether attempted corruption by threat is a lesser included criminal offense under section 838.021. We find that it is not and that defendant's conviction must be reversed.

If a crime is itself an attempt to do an act or accomplish a result, there can be no lesser included offense of attempting to commit that crime. Milazzo v. State, 377 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1979). In Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377, 381 (Fla. 1968), this court said:

(T)he trial judge must determine as a matter of law whether an attempt to commit the crime charged would itself constitute an offense under Florida law. If he determines that it does . . . then he must instruct the jury on the subject of such attempt, and the jury may find guilt accordingly. In this situation it is immaterial whether the accusatory pleading specifically charges an attempt . . ..

See also Milazzo v. State.

A reading of section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1977), reveals that the attempt to carry out the criminal act of corruption by threat is included within the definition of the act itself. It provides:

(1) Whoever unlawfully harms or threatens unlawful harm to any public servant, to his immediate family, or to any other person with whose welfare he is interested, with the intent or purpose:

(a) To influence the performance of any act or omission which the person believes to be, or the public servant represents as being, within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty.

(b) To cause or induce him to use or exert, or procure the use or exertion of, any influence upon or with any other public servant regarding any act or omission which the person believes to be, or the public servant represents as being, within the official discretion of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Sykes
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 7, 1983
    ...436 So.2d 30 (Fla.1982); Adams v. Murphy, 394 So.2d 411 (Fla.1981), on quest. certified, 598 F.2d 982 (5th Cir.1979); Pagano v. State, 387 So.2d 349 (Fla.1980); Milazzo v. State, 377 So.2d 1161 (Fla.1979); King v. State, 339 So.2d 172 (Fla.1976), affirming 317 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975);......
  • Schaffer v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • March 1, 2011
    ...to do an act or accomplish a result, there can be no lesser[-]included offense of attempting to commit that crime.” Pagano v. State, 387 So.2d 349, 350 (Fla.1980). ¶ 81. To best illustrate the problem, if Shaffer had typed a sexually explicit invitation to “Chloe” on his computer but had pr......
  • Sykes v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 22, 1981
    ...in the statutory definition of the substantive offense itself. See Silvestri v. State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Pagano v. State, 387 So.2d 349 (Fla.1980); and McAbee v. State, 391 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980). Furthermore, one case has specifically held that there is no such offen......
  • Achin v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 21, 1982
    ...for the nonexistent offense be given. We find conflict with our decisions in Adams v. Murphy, 394 So.2d 411 (Fla.1981), and Pagano v. State, 387 So.2d 349 (Fla.1980). 1 We hold that one may never be convicted of a nonexistent crime and remand for a new trial, finding that defense counsel in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT