Pannell v. Food Services of America, s. 24608-9-
Decision Date | 28 May 1991 |
Docket Number | Nos. 24608-9-,24702-6-I,s. 24608-9- |
Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Parties | w, 57 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1062 Ronald PANNELL; Rodney D. Adler; Albert Hasson; Ronald Maes; Robert Miller, Respondents, v. FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation; Tradewell Group, Inc., a Washington corporation; d/b/a Tradewell Stores, Appellants, Price Setter Stores, Inc.; and Prairie Market Stores, Inc., Washington corporations, Defendants, and Thomas Stewart, an individual, Appellant. |
To continue reading
Request your trial39 cases
-
Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
...age discrimination is addressed in Allison v. Housing Auth., 118 Wash.2d 79, 821 P.2d 34 (1991); see also Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wash.App. 418, 431, 810 P.2d 952 (1991) (approving instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in termination); Stork v. Interna......
-
Mackay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.
...Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co., 66 Wash.App. 510, 832 P.2d 537 (1992), aff'd, 123 Wash.2d 93, 864 P.2d 937 (1994); Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wash.App. 418, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008, 824 P.2d 490 (1992); deLisle v. FMC Corp., 57 Wash.App. 79, ......
-
Goodman v. Boeing Co.
...pay should be determined by a jury. These are often cases where reinstatement is not an available remedy." Pannell v. Food Services of America, 61 Wash.App. 418, 442, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008, 824 P.2d 490 (1992). A court does not err in failing to ......
-
Carle v. McChord Credit Union
...a trial court has discretion. Xieng v. Peoples Nat'l Bank, 63 Wash.App. 572, 586, 821 P.2d 520 (1991) (costs); Pannell v. Food Servs. of Amer., 61 Wash.App. 418, 447, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008 (1992) (costs). Its exercise of that discretion will not ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...786 (1905): 4.4(2)(c) Pac. Nw. Pipeline Corp. v. Myers, 50 Wn.2d 288, 311 P.2d 655 (1957): 11.7(1)(a)(ii) Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wn. App. 418, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wn.2d 1008 (1992): 11.7(2)(a)(i) Panorama Village Condo. Owners Ass'n Bd. of Direct......
-
§ 11.7 Particular Applications of the General Rule and Its Exceptions
...of an instruction does not preserve a claim of error regarding a different part of the instruction. See Pannell v. Food Servs. Of Am., 61 Wn.App. 418, 445, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991) (citing CR 51(f); Haslund v. State, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614, 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)), review denied, 118 Wn.2......