Pannell v. Food Services of America, s. 24608-9-

Decision Date28 May 1991
Docket NumberNos. 24608-9-,24702-6-I,s. 24608-9-
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
Partiesw, 57 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1062 Ronald PANNELL; Rodney D. Adler; Albert Hasson; Ronald Maes; Robert Miller, Respondents, v. FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation; Tradewell Group, Inc., a Washington corporation; d/b/a Tradewell Stores, Appellants, Price Setter Stores, Inc.; and Prairie Market Stores, Inc., Washington corporations, Defendants, and Thomas Stewart, an individual, Appellant.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1991
    ...age discrimination is addressed in Allison v. Housing Auth., 118 Wash.2d 79, 821 P.2d 34 (1991); see also Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wash.App. 418, 431, 810 P.2d 952 (1991) (approving instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in termination); Stork v. Interna......
  • Mackay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 20, 1995
    ...Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co., 66 Wash.App. 510, 832 P.2d 537 (1992), aff'd, 123 Wash.2d 93, 864 P.2d 937 (1994); Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wash.App. 418, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008, 824 P.2d 490 (1992); deLisle v. FMC Corp., 57 Wash.App. 79, ......
  • Goodman v. Boeing Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 1994
    ...pay should be determined by a jury. These are often cases where reinstatement is not an available remedy." Pannell v. Food Services of America, 61 Wash.App. 418, 442, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008, 824 P.2d 490 (1992). A court does not err in failing to ......
  • Carle v. McChord Credit Union
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 15, 1992
    ...a trial court has discretion. Xieng v. Peoples Nat'l Bank, 63 Wash.App. 572, 586, 821 P.2d 520 (1991) (costs); Pannell v. Food Servs. of Amer., 61 Wash.App. 418, 447, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wash.2d 1008 (1992) (costs). Its exercise of that discretion will not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...786 (1905): 4.4(2)(c) Pac. Nw. Pipeline Corp. v. Myers, 50 Wn.2d 288, 311 P.2d 655 (1957): 11.7(1)(a)(ii) Pannell v. Food Servs. of Am., 61 Wn. App. 418, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991), review denied, 118 Wn.2d 1008 (1992): 11.7(2)(a)(i) Panorama Village Condo. Owners Ass'n Bd. of Direct......
  • § 11.7 Particular Applications of the General Rule and Its Exceptions
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 11 Scope of Review and Preservation of Error in the Trial Court
    • Invalid date
    ...of an instruction does not preserve a claim of error regarding a different part of the instruction. See Pannell v. Food Servs. Of Am., 61 Wn.App. 418, 445, 810 P.2d 952, 815 P.2d 812 (1991) (citing CR 51(f); Haslund v. State, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614, 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)), review denied, 118 Wn.2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT