Paravecchio v. Memorial Hosp. of Laramie County
Decision Date | 17 September 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 87-22,87-22 |
Citation | 742 P.2d 1276 |
Parties | Russell F. PARAVECCHIO, D.M.D., Appellant (Plaintiff), v. MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF LARAMIE COUNTY and DePaul Hospital, Appellees (Defendants). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
John J. Metzke and Thomas N. Long of Hirst & Applegate, Cheyenne, for appellant.
W. Perry Dray and Gregory C. Dyekman of Dray, Madison & Thomson, P.C., Cheyenne, for appellee Memorial Hosp. of Laramie County.
David H. Carmichael of Carmichael, McNiff & Patton, Cheyenne, for appellee DePaul Hosp.
Jane A. Villemez of Charles E. Graves & Associates, Cheyenne, and Hugh A. Burns of Burns & Figa, P.C., Denver, Colo., filed amicus curiae for the American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists.
Before BROWN, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT, and MACY, JJ.
In this case, we are asked to determine whether a person licensed to practice dentistry in Wyoming 1 who has special training and experience in the field of general anesthesia, but is not a licensed physician in Wyoming 2 is authorized to practice general anesthesiology. We hold that appellant's dental license does not authorize the administration of anesthesia for nondental purposes. We affirm the trial court's order dismissing appellant's complaints, each seeking a declaratory judgment.
On March 28, 1984, appellant Russell F. Paravecchio, D.M.D., applied for an appointment of staff anesthesiologist with privileges appropriate to the full practice of anesthesiology from appellees, Memorial Hospital of Laramie County (Memorial), and DePaul Hospital (DePaul). The Departments of Anesthesiology of Memorial and DePaul jointly reviewed appellant's credentials. Memorial's Executive Committee and also its Board of Trustees both denied appellant's application. Appellant requested and received a review of this denial, pursuant to Memorial's by-laws, before Memorial's Joint Hearing Committee. That committee affirmed the initial decisions denying appellant's application. DePaul's Medical Staff Executive Committee similarly denied appellant's request for anesthesiology privileges.
Appellant filed separate suits against Memorial and DePaul raising two general claims and seeking declaratory judgments for relief: (1) a declaration that Wyoming law currently authorizes a dentist who has successfully completed accredited anesthesiology residency training to legally and independently engage in the professional practice of clinical anesthesiology, and (2) a declaration that the denial of hospital privileges in anesthesiology by the appellee hospitals was impermissible. These complaints were amended on May 7, 1986. Both appellee hospitals filed counterclaims also seeking declaratory judgments that the practice of clinical anesthesiology is the practice of medicine as defined by § 33-26-101, W.S.1977, of the Wyoming Medical Practice Act, and that the hospitals acted properly in denying anesthesiology privileges to appellant.
Appellant filed motions to dismiss both of appellees' counterclaims and both appellees filed motions to dismiss appellant's amended complaints. Motions also were made by both appellees to join the Wyoming Board of Medical Examiners and solely by appellee Memorial to join the Wyoming Board of Dental Examiners as indispensable party defendants. A joint motion to consolidate the two cases was made by all three parties. 3
After a hearing, the trial court ordered that appellant's amended complaints against Memorial and DePaul be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure, and that the motions made by both Memorial and DePaul to join the Wyoming Board of Medical Examiners as a party to litigation be denied. The effect of the order dismissing appellant's amended complaints was to deny the counterclaims of DePaul and Memorial, neither of which has appealed from that ruling. This appeal followed.
Appellant raises one issue, essentially agreed to by appellees:
"May a documentably competent anesthesiologist practice the full clinical scope of anesthesiology in Wyoming if he or she is licensed by the state of Wyoming as a dentist and is not licensed by the state of Wyoming as a physician."
In his first argument, appellant asserts that the scope of dentistry as defined by the Wyoming Dental Practice Act is sufficiently broad to include those procedures necessary in the general practice of anesthesiology by a dentist. He then argues that the delivery of anesthesia may not be considered exclusive to the practice of medicine and therefore, may not be solely limited by the Wyoming Medical Practice Act. We cannot agree.
This case turns on a simple legal question: Does the appellant have the statutory authority in Wyoming to administer general nondental anesthesia under a dental license? Our answer must be based on settled principles of statutory construction. Appellant's extensive arguments regarding his qualifications to practice general anesthesiology are not relevant to this inquiry, and will not be considered.
When interpreting statutes, we must first look to the applicable statute itself giving the words employed by the legislature their plain and ordinary meaning in an attempt to construe legislative intent. City of Evanston v. Robinson, Wyo., 702 P.2d 1283 (1985). We also read statutes relating to the same subject together to effectuate legislative intent. WYMO Fuels, Inc. v. Edwards, Wyo., 723 P.2d 1230 (1986).
Wyoming statutes define the scope of authorized practice for the general field of medicine as well as many specialized areas of practice, including the field of dentistry. 4 The Wyoming Dental Practice Act, § 33-15-114, W.S.1977 (1986 Cum.Supp.), states in pertinent part:
In § 33-15-128, W.S.1977 (1986 Cum.Supp.), the act further states in pertinent part:
To find that the practice of general nondental anesthesiology is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Statewide Collections, Inc., 88-285
...Cross Association v. Harris, 664 F.2d 806 (10th Cir.1981); Sanchez v. State, 751 P.2d 1300 (Wyo.1988); Paravecchio v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County, 742 P.2d 1276 (Wyo.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 915, 108 S.Ct. 1088, 99 L.Ed.2d 249 (1988); State Board of Equalization v. Jackson Hole ......
-
Mills v. Reynolds
...under Wyo. Const. art. 1, § 34. Subsequent cases have maintained the justification set forth in Kendig. Paravecchio v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County, 742 P.2d 1276 (Wyo.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 915, 108 S.Ct. 1088, 99 L.Ed.2d 249 (1988); Baskin v. State ex rel. Worker's Compensati......
-
Wyoming State Bd. of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.
...between denial to a trained anesthesiologist of the opportunity to pursue his educational capabilities in Paravecchio v. Memorial Hosp. of Laramie County, 742 P.2d 1276 (Wyo.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 915, 108 S.Ct. 1088, 99 L.Ed.2d 249 (1988) and this case, where by contract compulsion, ......
-
Parker Land and Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game and Fish Com'n
...management. Additionally, I apply another tenant of statutory interpretation, presumed constitutionality, Paravecchio v. Memorial Hosp. of Laramie County, 742 P.2d 1276 (Wyo.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 915, 108 S.Ct. 1088, 99 L.Ed.2d 249 (1988), for a result that would not justify the taki......