Parents Against Realignment v. GHSA
| Decision Date | 17 May 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. S99A0654.,S99A0654. |
| Citation | 271 Ga. 114,516 S.E.2d 528 |
| Parties | PARENTS AGAINST REALIGNMENT v. GEORGIA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Patrick W. McKee, McKee & Barge, Atlanta, for Parents Against Realignment.
Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, Kathryn L. Allen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Judith Anne O'Brien, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, Alan W. Connell, Thomaston, for Georgia High School Association et al.
The Georgia High School Association (GHSA) is an unincorporated association which was voluntarily formed by junior and senior high schools to administer their interscholastic competitive events and to standardize rules of eligibility and play. GHSA recently reassigned three high schools in Fulton County to another region for purposes of interscholastic athletic competition. The principals of the high schools appealed the realignments to the GHSA reclassification committee and then to the GHSA executive committee, but GHSA refused to rescind the reclassifications. Thereafter, parents of students in the three high schools formed Parents Against Realignment (PAR), which brought suit against GHSA, the State Department of Education, the State Board of Education, Board Chairman Johnny Isakson, and School Superintendent Linda Schrenko. PAR alleged that the realignment violated certain constitutional and statutory provisions, and sought an injunction against the realignment and a declaration that GHSA's action is void. The trial court permitted Fulton County School District to intervene, denied interlocutory relief, and subsequently dismissed the case.
PAR contends that the trial court erroneously determined that the case does not present a justiciable controversy. Courts are ill-equipped to make fundamental, legislative, and administrative policy decisions which are involved in the everyday administration of a public school system. Deriso v. Cooper, 246 Ga. 540, 543(1), 272 S.E.2d 274 (1980). Resolution of "discretionary policy determinations best can be made by other branches of government." Deriso v. Cooper, supra at 543(1), 272 S.E.2d 274. The Georgia Constitution of 1983, Art. VIII, Sec. V, Par. II "`clearly manifests an intent to entrust the schools to the boards of education rather than the courts.'" (Emphasis supplied.) Powell v. Studstill, 264 Ga. 109, 111(2), 441 S.E.2d 52 (1994). Judicial restraint regarding school administration is born "of the necessity for shielding the courts from an incalculable new potential for lawsuits...." Woodruff v. Ga. State Univ., 251 Ga. 232, 234, 304 S.E.2d 697 (1983). "Absent...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Carrigan v. N.H. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
...that we have nothing to do with the propriety, expediency, or policy of any law ...."); see also Parents Against Realignment v. GHSA, 271 Ga. 114, 516 S.E.2d 528, 529 (1999) (explaining that courts are improper forums in which to resolve "discretionary policy determinations" (quotation omit......
-
Ga. High Sch. Ass'n v. Charlton Cnty. Sch. Dist.
...speech, and other fine arts competitions among high schools in the State of Georgia.1 See Parents Against Realignment v. Georgia High School Assn ., 271 Ga. 114, 114, 516 S.E.2d 528 (1999). GHSA divides its member high schools into classifications based on student enrollment and then groups......
-
Rivers v. State, S99A0791.
... ... assistance of counsel at trial and because the evidence presented against him was not sufficient to authorize the judgment of conviction. We ... ...
-
Board of Regents v. Houston, A06A1165.
...schools to [supervising authorities] rather than the courts." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Parents Against Realignment v. Ga. High School Assn., 271 Ga. 114, 516 S.E.2d 528 (1999). Since the trial court's hearing on its order entering a final injunction was not transcribed, we must ......