Parsons v. Knoxville Fire Ins. Co.

Decision Date03 March 1896
Citation132 Mo. 583,34 S.W. 476
PartiesPARSONS et al. v. KNOXVILLE FIRE INS. CO.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. In an action on an insurance policy, which provided that, if the insured did not own the land on which the insured building was situated, the policy should be void, unless such fact appeared in writing thereon, it appeared that plaintiff did not, in his application, claim to own the land, and that defendant's agent knew at the time the policy was issued that plaintiff did not own it. Held, that defendant was estopped to claim a forfeiture for breach of such stipulation, though the policy provided that a waiver of any conditions thereof by the agent should be indorsed thereon. 31 S. W. 117, affirmed.

2. An agent of an insurance company, who has authority to issue and countersign policies, may strike out parts of a provision in regard to the keeping of a set of books "locked in a fire-proof safe" at night, on objection thereto by the proposed insurer. 31 S. W. 117, affirmed.

Macfarlane, Burgess, and Robinson, JJ., dissenting.

In banc. Appeal from circuit court, Mercer county.

Action by W. E. Parsons & Son against the Knoxville Fire Insurance Company to recover on a fire insurance policy. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed in division, and transferred to court in banc. Affirmed.

For opinion in division, see 31 S. W. 117.

PER CURIAM.

On rehearing in banc. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed as directed in the foregoing opinion (31 S. W. 117) handed down in division No. 1.

GANTT and SHERWOOD, JJ., concurring with BRACE, C. J., in the opinion. BARCLAY, J., in the result. MACFARLANE, BURGESS, and ROBINSON, JJ., dissenting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • Cohen v. Home Ins., Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • March 8, 1918
    ... ... corporation of New York, for recovery on two fire insurance ... policies. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error ... Judgment affirmed, ... 238, 74 ... Am. St. Rep. 521; Ins. Co. v. Dowdall, 159 Ill. 179, ... 42 N.E. 606; Parsons v. Ins. Co., 132 Mo. 583, 31 ... S.W. 117 ( affirmed in 132 Mo. 583, 34 S.W ... 476); ... ...
  • Leisen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 10, 1910
    ...58, 17 South. 13;Flournoy v. Insurance Co., 80 Mo. App. 655;Parsons v. Insurance Co., 132 Mo. 583, 31 S. W. 117, affirmed in bank 132 Mo. 583, 34 S. W. 476;Benjamin v. Insurance Co., 80 App. Div. 260, 80 N. Y. Supp. 256, affirmed in 177 N. Y. 588, 70 N. E. 1095;Grabbs v. Insurance Co., 125 ......
  • Cohen v. Home Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • March 8, 1920
    ...Co. v. Ins. Co., 151 Mo. 90, 52 S. W. 238, 74 Am. St. Rep, 521; Ins. Co. v. Dowdall, 159 Ill. 179, 42 N. E. 606; Parsons v. Ins. Co., 132 Mo. 583, 31 S. W. 117 (affirmed in 132 Mo. 583, 34 S. W. 476); Godfrey v. Ins. Co., 169 N. C. 238, 84 S. E. 339; Gwaltney v. Prov. Life Assur. Soc, 132 N......
  • Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. Marsh
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1912
    ... ... by the Court ...          When a ... local agent of a fire insurance company, who has the power to ... accept a risk and deliver the policy of insurance, at ... 431; Williams v. Bankers' & Merchants' Town Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 73 Mo.App. 607; ... Parsons v. Knoxville F. Ins. Co., 132 Mo. 583, 31 ... S.W. 117, 34 S.W. 476; Hamilton v. Insurance Co., 94 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT