El Paso Electric Co. v. Leeper
Decision Date | 26 May 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 1671-6151.,1671-6151. |
Citation | 60 S.W.2d 187 |
Parties | EL PASO ELECTRIC CO. v. LEEPER. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Brown & Brooke, of El Paso, and Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton, of Houston, for plaintiff in error.
Knollenberg & Cameron and E. F. Cameron, all of El Paso, for defendant in error.
This suit was filed in the district court of El Paso county, Tex., by Miss Augusta Leeper against El Paso Electric Company, a corporation, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by Miss Leeper as the result of the negligence of the electric company. The case was submitted to a jury on special issues and based on the answers thereto, judgment was entered for Miss Leeper for $7,500. This judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 42 S.W.(2d) 863. The electric company brings error.
The case is before the Supreme Court on numerous assignments of error, but the view we take of the issue of joint enterprise makes it unnecessary for us to consider any other question.
It is shown by the evidence that while the car in which Miss Leeper was riding, but which was being driven by Lieut. Nutter, was rounding a curve on a wet paved road it left the pavement and struck one of the transmission wire poles belonging to the electric company. Four people were riding in the car at the time, to wit: Miss Leeper, Lieut. Nutter, Lieut. Howze, and Mrs. Howze. Miss Leeper was badly injured, and Mrs. Howze was killed in the accident. It is shown that the accident occurred at night. The pole in question was located at a point in the road right of way, at its intersection with another public road, and about twelve feet from the edge of the pavement of the road on which the car in which Miss Leeper was riding was traveling. Also the point of intersection of the pole was between the two roads.
The jury found the electric company guilty of negligence in placing and maintaining its transmission line pole at the place it was, resultant injuries to Miss Leeper, and the amount of her damages.
The jury also found that Lieut. Nutter, who was driving the car in question at the time of the accident, was negligent, and that his negligence was a proximate cause of the accident.
The electric company contended in the district court, and Court of Civil Appeals, and here contends, that the evidence in this case shows as a matter of law that Miss Leeper and Lieut. Nutter were engaged in a joint enterprise in driving the car at the time of the accident. In this connection, the electric company contends that the evidence in the case shows as a matter of law that Miss Leeper had at least had an equal right with Lieut. Nutter to control the car in which they were driving. It is then contended that the finding of the jury that Lieut. Nutter was guilty of negligence and that such negligence was the proximate cause of the accident entitled the electric company to a judgment.
The evidence bearing on the question of joint enterprise and control of the car is all included in the testimony of Miss Leeper and her mother, Mrs. Wallace. We therefore deem it expedient to quote all of the testimony bearing on that question.
Miss Leeper was sworn as a witness in her own behalf, and touching the question of joint enterprise and control of the car she testified as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Walker v. Texas Elec. Service Co.
...right, express or implied, to direct and control the conduct of each other in the operation of the conveyance.' El Paso Elec. Co. v. Leeper, Tex.Com.App., 60 S.W.2d 187; LeSage v. Pryor, 137 Tex. 455, 154 S.W.2d 446; Straffus v. Barclay, 147 Tex. 600, 219 S.W.2d 65; Douty v. Delta Drilling ......
-
Wanda Petroleum Co. v. Hahn
...right, express or implied, to direct and control the conduct of each other in the operation of the conveyance.' El Paso Electric Co. v. Leeper, Tex.Com.App., 60 S.W.2d 187, 189; Straffus v. Barclay, 147 Tex. 600, 219 S.W.2d As indicated above, the principal question in this appeal is whethe......
-
Siratt v. Worth Const. Co.
...joint control and responsibility for its operation. Simensky v. Zwyer, 40 Ohio App. 275, 178 N.W. 422. * * *' El Paso Electric Co. v. Leeper, Tex.Com.App., 60 S.W.2d 187, 189. 'In order to constitute occupants of a conveyance joint adventurers, there must be not only joint interest in the o......
-
Gillette Motor Transport v. Fine
...41 S.W.2d 488; Ramin v. Cosio, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 802; Waggoner v. Simmons, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 553; El Paso Electric Co. v. Leeper, Tex.Com.App., 60 S.W.2d 187; Ex parte Williams, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 148, 79 S.W.2d 325; Reilley v. Buster, 125 Tex. 323, 82 S.W.2d 931; Texas Co. v. Bette......