Paxton v. Trust Co. Bank of Gwinnett County, 36047
| Decision Date | 27 May 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 36047,36047 |
| Citation | 268 S.E.2d 154,245 Ga. 834 |
| Parties | PAXTON et al. v. TRUST COMPANY BANK OF GWINNETT COUNTY. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Glyndon C. Pruitt, Buford, for appellants.
G. Hughel Harrison, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
This is an appeal from the denial of a permanent injunction against a foreclosure sale of appellants' property.
Appellee, as successor in interest to the Gwinnett Commercial Bank, advertised certain property for sale on which it had a deed to secure debt from appellants. Appellants sought to enjoin the bank from exercising its power of sale contending that the original parties to the deed had orally modified it, and no money was currently owing under their agreement. The trial court denied appellant relief on the basis that no modification of the deed had been shown.
1. Appellants contend that the trial court did not file its findings of facts and conclusions of law as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152(a). In reviewing the trial court's order which sets forth facts brought out at the brief hearing on this issue, we find that it sufficiently sets forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon to satisfy the requirements of Code Ann. § 81A-152(a). See Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga.App. 613, 211 S.E.2d 642 (1974).
2. The trial court found that there had been no modification of the original agreement between the parties. After a careful review of the record and the transcript of proceedings, we hold that such finding was correct. See Bowman v. McDonough Realty Co., 143 Ga.App. 128, 237 S.E.2d 647 (1977).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chambless Ford Tractor, Inc. v. McGlaun Farms, Inc.
...supra. Georgia courts have recently held that a substantial compliance with the Codal requirements is sufficient. Paxton v. Trust Co. Bank, 245 Ga. 834, 268 S.E.2d 154 (1980); Frasier v. Dept. of Human Resources, supra. In the instant case the court's conclusion is obvious from the text of ......
- Yearta v. Scroggins
-
Carter v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Atlanta, s. 72476
...trial, we find that it provides sufficient findings and conclusions as to afford intelligent review of the matter. Paxton v. Trust Co. Bank, 245 Ga. 834, 268 S.E.2d 154 (1980); see also Doyal Dev. Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga.App. 613, 211 S.E.2d 642 2. In computing the accelerated balance in its p......
-
Chamlee v. Department of Transp., 74034
...compliance with Rule 52(a) in the oral recitations of the court's conclusions presented during the hearing. See Paxton v. Trust Co. Bank, 245 Ga. 834(1), 268 S.E.2d 154. There being no express waiver of the statutory requirements, this case must be remanded with direction that the trial jud......