People ex parte Wright v. Wilkins
| Citation | 210 N.Y.S.2d 309,26 Misc.2d 1090 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York ex parte Wesley WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. Walter H. WILKINS, Warden, Attica State Prison, Respondent. |
| Decision Date | 01 February 1961 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New York) |
Wesley Wright, in pro. per., for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. (Frederick T. Devlin, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for respondent.
This is stated to be a proceeding under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. The gist of the petitioner's complaint is that he is not permitted by the prison authorities at Attica State Prison to take his Arabic grammar with him to the prison recreational yard to use in studying the Arabic language which he maintains will be helpful to him in advancing in his Islam religious faith.
The petitioner maintains that he is denied his constitutional right to the free exercise and enjoyment of his religion and that he is being discriminated against because of his religion. The use of a grammer to study a foreign language is obviously not the practice of any religion. But assuming, contrary to the fact, that such study is a religious practice, the prison officials would have the power under the provisions of § 610 of the Correction Law to restrict the use of the grammar to places other than the recreational prison yard. Section 610 after providing for religious services for prison inmates reads:
'* * *; such services to be held and such advice and ministration to be given within the buildings or grounds where the inmates are required by law to be confined, in such manner and at such hours as will be in harmony, as aforesaid, with the discipline and the rules and regulations of the institution * * *'
The petitioner admits that he is permitted to use his Arabic grammar in his cell. His complaint in this connection is that he wishes to reserve the time in his cell for other reading. That the Department of Correction has made provision for the religious needs and welfare of the inmates of Attica Prison who claim to be adherents of the numerous sects of the the Islamic religion is shown by the list of Islamic religious books translated into English that are made available to the prisoners. (See Exhibit 'A' attached to the answering affidavit).
The question as to what materials the prisoners are permitted or are not permitted to take with them in the prison recreational yard or elsewhere in the prison is a matter of prison discipline entrusted by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williford v. People of California
...184, 295 F.2d 171; D.C., 206 F.Supp. 370; Brown v. McGinnis, 10 N.Y.2d 531, 225 N.Y.S.2d 497, 180 N.E.2d 791; People ex rel. Wright v. Wilkins, 26 Misc.2d 1090, 210 N.Y.S.2d 309; In re Ferguson, 55 Cal. 2d 663, 12 Cal.Rptr. 753, 361 P.2d 417; and see In re Jones, 57 Cal.2d 860, 862, 22 Cal.......
-
Jones, In re
...2 Emerson & Haber, Political and Civil Rights in the United States (2d ed. 1958) pp. 1184-1187; see also People ex parte Wright v. Wilkins, 26 Misc.2d 1090, 210 N.Y.S.2d 309; McBride v. McCorkle, (44 N.J.Super. 468, 130 A.2d For these reasons, the petition properly alleged grounds for the i......
-
Barone v. Warden, Manhattan House of Detention for Men
...for an order directing the Commissioner of Correction to permit petitioner the free exercise of his religion); Wright v. Wilkins, 26 Misc.2d 1090, 210 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1961) (Article 78 proceeding by prisoner challenging refusal of prison authorities to permit him to take Arabic grammar materi......