People ex rel. Eldridge Levy v. Dalsheim

Decision Date15 January 1980
Citation48 N.Y.2d 1019,425 N.Y.S.2d 802
Parties, 402 N.E.2d 141 The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Eldridge LEVY, Respondent, v. Stephen DALSHEIM, Superintendent, Ossining Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (66 A.D.2d 827, 411 N.Y.S.2d 343).

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • People ex rel. Robertson v. New York State Div. of Parole
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 3 Abril 1986
    ...58 A.D.2d 987, 397 N.Y.S.2d 266). The Diamond procedure is, moreover, inconsistent with our holding in People ex rel. Levy v. Dalsheim, 48 N.Y.2d 1019, 425 N.Y.S.2d 802, 402 N.E.2d 141, affirming for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (66 A.D.2d 827, 828, 411 N.Y.S.2d 343), its ho......
  • Uviles v. City of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 5 Mayo 2023
    ... ... voidness, Levy v. Dalsheim, 66 A.D.2d 827, 411 ... N.Y.S.2d 343, ... in Exec. Law § 259-i. See People ex rel. Matthews v ... New York State Div. of ... ...
  • Soto v. New York State Bd. of Parole
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Enero 1985
    ...for an untimely final parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Levy v. Dalsheim, 66 A.D.2d 827, 411 N.Y.S.2d 343, affd. 48 N.Y.2d 1019, 425 N.Y.S.2d 802, 402 N.E.2d 141). Accordingly, a habeas corpus proceeding is generally the appropriate vehicle to review parole revocation proceedings in......
  • People ex rel. Walker v. New York State Bd. of Parole
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 Diciembre 1983
    ...v. Schager, 93 A.D.2d 847, 461 N.Y.S.2d 75; People ex rel. Levy v. Dalsheim, 66 A.D.2d 827, 411 N.Y.S.2d 343, affd. 48 N.Y.2d 1019, 425 N.Y.S.2d 802, 402 N.E.2d 141). In this case, however, the final hearing was scheduled within the statutory period and the adjournment for the purpose of ob......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT