People v. El
| Decision Date | 07 May 1998 |
| Parties | 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 4384 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rhagi EL, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Marc Frazier Scholl, for Respondent.
Barbara Zolot, for Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered April 3, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first and second degrees, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a violent felony offender, to two prison terms of 5 to 15 years on the first-degree assault and second-degree weapon convictions, and two terms of 2 1/3 to 7 years on the second-degree assault and third-degree weapon convictions, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.
The trial court sufficiently apprised defendant of the risks and dangers of self-representation and thus properly granted his request to proceed pro se. The court specifically warned defendant that he would be bound by the rules of evidence and Penal Law, and would not receive any special treatment or explanations but would be held to the same standards as an attorney. The court advised him against self-representation and standby counsel remained throughout the trial to advise defendant (see, People v. Vivenzio, 62 N.Y.2d 775, 477 N.Y.S.2d 318, 465 N.E.2d 1254).
Defendant's claim that the sentence was based on improper criteria is unpreserved and unsupported by the record, and we perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing.
We have considered defendant's other arguments and find that they do not warrant reversal.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rhagi v. Artuz
... ... His conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division on May 7, 1998, People v. El, 250 A.D.2d 395, 671 N.Y.S.2d 654 (1st Dep't 1998), and leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals was denied on June 25, 1998, People v. El, 92 N.Y.2d 851, 677 N.Y.S.2d 82, 699 N.E.2d 442 (1998) ... El filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 ... ...
-
Josephine F. v. (In re Starlaylah C.)
...right to assigned counsel” (id.). Further, Family Court sufficiently advised the mother of the risks of self-representation (People v. El,250 A.D.2d 395, 396, 671 N.Y.S.2d 654 [1st Dept.1998], lv. denied92 N.Y.2d 851, 677 N.Y.S.2d 82, 699 N.E.2d 442 [1998]), and it had no obligation to assi......
- People v. El