People v. Alvarez
Citation | 2007 NY Slip Op 10485,46 A.D.3d 476,849 N.Y.S.2d 207 |
Decision Date | 27 December 2007 |
Docket Number | 2437. |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL ALVAREZ, Appellant. |
The court properly denied defendant's CPL speedy trial motion since it was not made upon reasonable notice to the People, as required by CPL 210.45 (1) (see e.g. People v Goberdhan, 249 AD2d 324 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 852 [1998]).
Defendant did not preserve his argument that his rights to testify and to a fair trial were undermined by remarks made by the court in admonishing him to speak loudly enough for the jury to hear him, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that there was nothing prejudicial in the court's admonition.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Rodriguez-Alas
...in order to provide them an opportunity to respond to a written motion from the defendant, pursuant to People v. Alvarez , 46 A.D.3d 476, 849 N.Y.S.2d 207 (1st Dept. 2007), which the court granted. The assigned Assistant District Attorney, appearing for the first time, made the additional r......
-
People v. Smith
...the defendant was proceeding pro se, the motion was not made on reasonable notice to the People (see CPL 210.45[1] ; People v. Alvarez , 46 A.D.3d 476, 849 N.Y.S.2d 207 ; People v. Goberdhan , 249 A.D.2d 324, 671 N.Y.S.2d 281 ; People v. Harvall , 196 A.D.2d 553, 601 N.Y.S.2d 146 ) and beca......
- People v. Akinpelu, 228 KA 13-01903
- People v. Huyler, 521727