People v. Alvarez

Citation2007 NY Slip Op 10485,46 A.D.3d 476,849 N.Y.S.2d 207
Decision Date27 December 2007
Docket Number2437.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL ALVAREZ, Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's CPL speedy trial motion since it was not made upon reasonable notice to the People, as required by CPL 210.45 (1) (see e.g. People v Goberdhan, 249 AD2d 324 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 852 [1998]).

Defendant did not preserve his argument that his rights to testify and to a fair trial were undermined by remarks made by the court in admonishing him to speak loudly enough for the jury to hear him, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that there was nothing prejudicial in the court's admonition.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Rodriguez-Alas
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • October 2, 2019
    ...in order to provide them an opportunity to respond to a written motion from the defendant, pursuant to People v. Alvarez , 46 A.D.3d 476, 849 N.Y.S.2d 207 (1st Dept. 2007), which the court granted. The assigned Assistant District Attorney, appearing for the first time, made the additional r......
  • People v. Smith
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 14, 2020
    ...the defendant was proceeding pro se, the motion was not made on reasonable notice to the People (see CPL 210.45[1] ; People v. Alvarez , 46 A.D.3d 476, 849 N.Y.S.2d 207 ; People v. Goberdhan , 249 A.D.2d 324, 671 N.Y.S.2d 281 ; People v. Harvall , 196 A.D.2d 553, 601 N.Y.S.2d 146 ) and beca......
  • People v. Akinpelu, 228 KA 13-01903
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 27, 2015
  • People v. Huyler, 521727
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 25, 2019
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT