People v. Armstead
| Decision Date | 11 March 2015 |
| Docket Number | 2012-09713 |
| Citation | 5 N.Y.S.3d 260,2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 01956,126 A.D.3d 805 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony D. ARMSTEAD, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Tina Grillo of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JEFFREY A. COHEN, and HECTOR D. LaSALLE, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), rendered September 17, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter, and the appeal is held in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report, which shall be filed with all convenient speed.
Prior to the imposition of sentence upon the defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, the defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty to that charge on the ground that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. At sentencing, assigned counsel stated that the defendant's plea was validly entered, and denied certain factual allegations raised by the defendant.
The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a position adverse to his (see People v. Mitchell, 21 N.Y.3d 964, 967, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ; People v. Barr, 116 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 983 N.Y.S.2d 875 ; People v. Duart, 113 A.D.3d 788, 789, 978 N.Y.S.2d 369 ; People v. Graves, 95 A.D.3d 1034, 1034–1035, 943 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People v. Vega, 88 A.D.3d 1022, 1022–1023, 931 N.Y.S.2d 883 ; People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529 ). The Supreme Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the motion (see People v. Barr, 116 A.D.3d at 1062, 983 N.Y.S.2d 875 ; People v. Duart, 113 A.D.3d at 789, 978 N.Y.S.2d 369 ; People v. Graves, 95 A.D.3d at 1034–1035, 943 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People v. Vega, 88 A.D.3d at 1022–1023, 931 N.Y.S.2d 883 ; People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d at 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529 ). Accordingly,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Etienne
...21 N.Y.3d at 966, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ; People v. Caple, 279 A.D.2d 635, 635, 720 N.Y.S.2d 166 ; cf. People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d 805, 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260 ; People v. Santana, 156 A.D.2d 736, 736, 550 N.Y.S.2d 356 ).The defendant's separate contention, not raised on his motio......
-
People v. Alvarado
...defendant for weapons, and handcuffed the defendant approximately three feet from the backpack. As soon as the defendant was handcuffed, 126 A.D.3d 805he started crying and said that his brother was just shot and that the guns were in the “bag.” At that point, the officer had probable cause......
-
People v. Jeffery
...; People v. Ferguson, 140 A.D.3d 976, 977, 32 N.Y.S.3d 516 ; People v. King, 129 A.D.3d 992, 993, 12 N.Y.S.3d 151 ; People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d 805, 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260 ; People v. Barr, 116 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 983 N.Y.S.2d 875 ; People v. Duart, 113 A.D.3d 788, 789, 978 N.Y.S.2d 369 ; Pe......
-
People v. Howell
...21 N.Y.3d 964, 967, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ; People v. King, 129 A.D.3d 992, 993, 12 N.Y.S.3d 151 ; People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d 805, 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260 ; People v. Duart, 113 A.D.3d 788, 789, 978 N.Y.S.2d 369 ; People v. Graves, 95 A.D.3d 1034, 1035, 943 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People ......