People v. Dixon

Decision Date16 June 2009
Docket Number2007-11337.
Citation63 A.D.3d 957,2009 NY Slip Op 05152,880 N.Y.S.2d 529
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LaTONYA DIXON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to hear and report on the defendant's motion to withdraw her plea of guilty, on which motion the defendant's appellate counsel shall represent her, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Nassau County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.

On the record presented, the Supreme Court erred in determining the defendant's motion for leave to withdraw her plea of guilty without a hearing after defense counsel adopted a position adverse to the defendant (see People v Earp, 7 AD3d 538, 539 [2004]; People v Caccavale, 305 AD2d 695 [2003]). The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when her attorney, in effect, became a witness against her and took a position adverse to her (see People v Bedoya, 53 AD3d 621 [2008]; People v Bryant, 22 AD3d 676, 677 [2005]; see also People v Hunter, 35 AD3d 1228 [2006]; People v Chaney, 294 AD2d 931, 932 [2002]). The Supreme Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the motion to withdraw the plea (see People v Bedoya, 53 AD3d 621 [2008]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to hear and report on the defendant's motion, on which the defendant is to be represented by the counsel assigned to represent her on this appeal. We hold the appeal in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. We express no opinion as to the merits of the defendant's motion, and we do not pass upon the remaining contention raised by the defendant on appeal.

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BALKIN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Deliser
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 21, 2011
    ...People v. Caple, 279 A.D.2d 635, 636, 720 N.Y.S.2d 166; People v. Richards, 227 A.D.2d 419, 419, 642 N.Y.S.2d 556; cf. People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529; People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788; People v. Bryant, 22 A.D.3d 676, 677, 804 N.Y.S.2d 347; People v. Earp,......
  • People v. Rivera
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 2, 2010
    ...As such, counsel took a position adverse to his client, requiring the appointment of new trial counsel on remittal ( see People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529; People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788; People v. Earp, 7 A.D.3d 538, 775 N.Y.S.2d 598; People v. Caccavale, ......
  • People v. Armstead
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 11, 2015
    ...v. Graves, 95 A.D.3d 1034, 1034–1035, 943 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People v. Vega, 88 A.D.3d 1022, 1022–1023, 931 N.Y.S.2d 883 ; People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529 ). The Supreme Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the mot......
  • People v. Vega
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 2011
    ...became a witness against him and took a position adverse to him with respect to the motion at sentencing ( see People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529; People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d 621, 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788; People v. Armstead, 35 A.D.3d 624, 626, 826 N.Y.S.2d 408; People v. B......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT