People v. Baker

Decision Date15 September 1983
Docket NumberDocket No. 62673
Citation127 Mich.App. 297,338 N.W.2d 391
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guy John BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Louis J. Caruso, Sol. Gen., Bruce Plackowski, Pros. Atty., and Michael A. Nickerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pros. Attys. Appellate Services, for the people.

State Appellate Defender by Terence R. Flanagan, for defendant-appellant.

Before DANHOF, C.J., and ALLEN and WALSH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of resisting or obstructing a police officer in the discharge of his duty, M.C.L. Sec. 750.479; M.S.A. Sec. 28.747, following a jury trial. He was placed on probation for 2 years with the first 6 months to be spent in jail. Defendant appeals his conviction as of right.

Defendant claims that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on a lesser offense of attempted resisting arrest. The trial court ruled that because the crime of resisting arrest is in the nature of an assault, it would be improper to give the requested instruction because there is no such crime as attempted assault. See People v. Banks, 51 Mich.App. 685, 216 N.W.2d 461 (1974).

We find it unnecessary to decide whether an attempt to resist arrest may be a lesser-included offense to this crime. Even assuming that the crime exists, we agree that it was inappropriate to give such an instruction in this case. A judge is only required to instruct on attempt where there is evidence indicating that only an attempt was committed. People v. Adams, 416 Mich. 53, 330 N.W.2d 634 (1982).

Defendant did not deny that he used force to resist the arrest. Rather, he claimed that the arrest was unlawful in that the degree of force used by the officer was excessive. Those claims, if believed, would have constituted complete defenses to the charge. See People v. Stark, 120 Mich.App. 350, 327 N.W.2d 474 (1982). There was no evidence that a crime was committed which was less than the completed offense. Therefore, an instruction on attempt was not appropriate. People v. Adams, supra.

Defendant also complains that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the misdemeanor offense of simple assault. M.C.L. Sec. 750.81; M.S.A. Sec. 28.276.

Assuming that defendant is correct in his claim that, because of the assaultive nature of his actions, simple assault was a cognate lesser-included offense to this charge, we do not believe that the trial court was required to give an instruction concerning that charge. In People v. Stephens, 416 Mich. 252, 330 N.W.2d 675 (1982), the Supreme Court backed away from the rule stated in People v. Chamblis, 395 Mich. 408, 429, 236 N.W.2d 473 (1975). Chamblis, supra, precluded the giving of instructions for misdemeanor offenses in most felony prosecutions. In Stephens, supra, the Court ruled that a requested misdemeanor instruction may be given if it is supported by a rational view of the evidence adduced at trial.

The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect police officers from physical violence and harm. People v. Kretchmer, 404...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Rogers v. Detroit Police Dept.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • January 16, 2009
    ...render the arrest unlawful, so excessive force was also a defense to the charge of resisting and obstructing. People v. Baker, 127 Mich.App. 297, 299, 338 N.W.2d 391 (1983).6 The right to resist an unlawful arrest was founded on the right of self-defense whereby the unlawful arrest was view......
  • Fleck v. Titan Tire Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • October 4, 2001
    ... ... the installer, did not inform of the nature of the hazard and the nature or severity of the consequences, and "studies have shown that service people typically do not read tread labels." Laughery Aff., attached report ¶¶ 2-4. The plaintiff does not state what would be adequate to warn ... ...
  • Rich v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • May 31, 2012
    ...to a lawful arrest is to protect police officers from the substantial risk of physical injury. See, e.g., People v. Baker, 127 Mich.App. 297, 338 N.W.2d 391, 393 (1983); Schrader v. State, 753 S.W.2d 733, 736 (Tex.App.1988). This concern for the safety of law enforcement personnel, however,......
  • People v. Morris, Docket No. 323762.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 11, 2016
    ...being the only element common to all six words.” Id. at 91, 631 N.W.2d 711 (opinion by MARKMAN, J.). See also People v. Baker, 127 Mich.App. 297, 299–300, 338 N.W.2d 391 (1983) (noting that “[t]he purpose of the resisting arrest statute [MCL 750.479 ] is to protect police officers from phys......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT