People v. Baxley

Decision Date14 June 1993
Citation599 N.Y.S.2d 105,194 A.D.2d 681
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Jeffrey BAXLEY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Steven J. Chananie, Robin A. Forshaw, and Yonette Sam, of counsel), for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and SULLIVAN, LAWRENCE and EIBER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered May 23, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), and burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court dated April 1, 1992, which denied, without a hearing, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction.

ORDERED that the judgment and the order are affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to set aside the verdict without a hearing. The so-called "newly-discovered evidence" consisted principally of a recantation by the People's main witnesses. In order to constitute newly-discovered evidence warranting a new trial, the proffered evidence must, inter alia, do more than merely impeach or contradict the former evidence (see, People v. Salemi, 309 N.Y. 208, 128 N.E.2d 377, cert. denied 350 U.S. 950, 76 S.Ct. 325, 100 L.Ed. 827; People v. Legette, 153 A.D.2d 760, 761, 545 N.Y.S.2d 296). Moreover, it has also been observed that recantation evidence is inherently unreliable and is insufficient alone to require setting aside a conviction (see, People v. Legette, supra; People v. Brown, 126 A.D.2d 898, 900, 510 N.Y.S.2d 932; People v. Allison, 119 A.D.2d 1005, 500 N.Y.S.2d 888). Guided by the foregoing principles, neither the recantation evidence nor the other evidence proffered by the defendant in support of the motion justified setting aside the defendant's judgment of conviction.

Moreover, we find that no Brady violation occurred with respect to the defendant (see, United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 3383, 87 L.Ed.2d 481; People v. Chin, 67 N.Y.2d 22, 33, 499 N.Y.S.2d 638, 490 N.E.2d 505; People v. Alongi, 131 A.D.2d 767, 768, 516 N.Y.S.2d 794).

Finally, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Hargrove
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 18, 2018
    ... ... Jones, 24 N.Y.3d 623, 627, 2 N.Y.S.3d 815, 26 N.E.3d 754 ; People v. Santos, 1 N.Y.3d 548, 548, 775 N.Y.S.2d 770, 807 N.E.2d 881 ; People v. Baxley, 84 N.Y.2d 208, 212, 616 N.Y.S.2d 7, 639 N.E.2d 746 ; People v. Brown, 56 N.Y.2d 242, 246, 451 N.Y.S.2d 693, 436 N.E.2d 1295 ; People v. Crimmins, 38 N.Y.2d 407, 409, 381 N.Y.S.2d 1, 343 N.E.2d 719 ; People v. Patrick, 182 N.Y. 131, 178, 74 N.E. 843 ; People v. Buchanan, 145 N.Y. 1, 30, 39 ... ...
  • People v. Douglas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 26, 2011
    ... ... The recantation evidence submitted in support of the motion was inherently unreliable and insufficient, alone, to justify withdrawal of the plea ( see People v. Mortensen, 60 A.D.3d 971, 972, 874 N.Y.S.2d 823; People v. Serrata, 261 A.D.2d 490, 690 N.Y.S.2d 273; People v. Baxley, 194 A.D.2d 681, 682, 599 N.Y.S.2d 105; People v. Legette, 153 A.D.2d 760, 761, 545 N.Y.S.2d 296). Furthermore, the defendant's contention regarding his innocence is unsupported by the record and did not afford a basis for withdrawal of the plea of guilty ( see People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, ... ...
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 25, 1997
    ... ... Thus, the court properly determined that codefendant Dicker's affidavit does not constitute newly discovered evidence and properly denied the CPL 440.10 motion without a hearing (see, People v. Davenport, 233 A.D.2d 771, 650 N.Y.S.2d 418; People v. Baxley, 194 A.D.2d 681, 682, 599 N.Y.S.2d 105, mod on other grounds 84 N.Y.2d 208, 616 N.Y.S.2d 7, 639 N.E.2d 746, rearg dismissed 86 N.Y.2d 886, 635 N.Y.S.2d 952, 659 N.E.2d 775; People v. Allison [appeal No. 1], 119 A.D.2d 1005, 500 N.Y.S.2d 888, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 665, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1030, 496 N.E.2d ... ...
  • People v. Baxley
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1994
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT