People v. Benn
| Decision Date | 13 November 1986 |
| Citation | 502 N.E.2d 996,510 N.Y.S.2d 81,68 N.Y.2d 941 |
| Parties | , 502 N.E.2d 996 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald BENN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 111 A.D.2d 1078, 491 N.Y.S.2d 883 should be affirmed.
Indicted on seven counts, including attempted murder, robbery, criminal use of a firearm and criminal possession of a weapon, defendant was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of robbery in the first degree in connection with an armed robbery at a social club in The Bronx. Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction on the sole ground that, at trial, he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Such a contention, necessarily retrospective, requires proof of true ineffectiveness rather than mere disagreement with strategies and tactics that failed. The overwhelming evidence indicating defendant's guilt--including his arrest at the scene of the robbery with two accomplices, identification at the trial by no less than five eyewitnesses, and physical evidence including seven bullets in his coat pocket--unquestionably challenged the resources of trial counsel. Having studied the record, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation.
Defendant's lawyer and two other lawyers representing codefendants in the joint trial pursued a common strategy: they charged that the three defendants had been framed by the police and club owner, acting in conspiracy, in order to cover up a gambling-related shooting; that the club was a center of vice; that the victims were in fact the villains; and that the jewelry and money allegedly stolen were gambling proceeds. This was not an implausible strategy. Indeed, defendant suggests nothing better. To some extent, this strategy succeeded, for counsel did in fact show (as promised in his opening) that the club was used for illicit operations--there was evidence that persons entering the club were searched and their weapons temporarily deposited in a gun depot behind the bar, that drugs were used openly, and that gambling operated regularly out of the back room--and he thus planted seeds of doubt about the credibility of the eyewitnesses and the possibility of alternate explanations for the events that occurred.
The present appeal centers not on any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. Lee
...or the scope of possible cross-examination, weighed long after the conclusion of the case, will not suffice ( People v. Benn, 68 N.Y.2d 941[, 510 N.Y.S.2d 81, 502 N.E.2d 996] [1986] ). Indeed, “a reviewing court must avoid confusing true ineffectiveness with mere losing tactics and accordin......
-
People v. Sullivan
...399, 408 N.Y.S.2d 444, 380 N.E.2d 272; see, People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698; People v. Benn, 68 N.Y.2d 941, 510 N.Y.S.2d 81, 502 N.E.2d 996; see also, People v. Coleman, 142 A.D.2d 586, 587-588, 530 N.Y.S.2d 242; People v. Nevarez, 141 A.D.2d 861, 862, 530 N......
-
People v. Alexander
...withdraw an offer is not in issue. Cf., Mabry v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 504, 104 S.Ct. 2543, 81 L.Ed.2d 437.11 In People v. Benn, 68 N.Y.2d 941, 942, 510 N.Y.S.2d 81, 502 N.E.2d 996, the Court of Appeals did not reach the People's argument that Strickland's prejudice test should be adopted.12 Pl......
-
People v. Vilardi
...assistance of counsel claims (see, e.g., People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698; People v. Benn, 68 N.Y.2d 941, 510 N.Y.S.2d 81, 502 N.E.2d 996).4 While writing for the court, Justice Blackmun was joined in this observation only by Justice O'Connor. Justices White,......