People v. Berry

Decision Date20 August 1979
Docket NumberNo. 28370,28370
Citation598 P.2d 1044,198 Colo. 258
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn Anthony BERRY, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Robert L. Russel, Dist. Atty., Robert M. Brown, Deputy Dist. Atty., El Paso County Judicial, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

At the conclusion of the People's evidence, the trial court granted defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal on a charge of theft of auto parts, namely, two hubcaps. The district attorney challenges the trial court's judgment based upon its allegedly erroneous application of the rule of law adopted by this court in People v. Bennett, 183 Colo. 125, 515 P.2d 466 (1973), which holds that to withstand a motion for a judgment of acquittal, the prosecution has the burden of establishing a prima facie case of guilt and must introduce sufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, no more, no less. We affirm the trial court's judgment.

From this record, we observe no lack of adherence to the guidelines set forth in Bennett, supra. As stated by this court in People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 (1971), this type of appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence serves little purpose and is rarely productive of any precedential value.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Ayala, 87SA187
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1989
    ...the evidence. Such appeals have been strongly discouraged. See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 The basis......
  • People v. Thompson, 81SA435
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1982
    ...the evidence. Such appeals have been strongly discouraged. See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 In our vi......
  • People v. Lyle, 79SA22
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1980
    ...serve little purpose and would have no significant precedential value. People v. Martinez, Colo., 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, Colo., 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 II. The People ne......
  • People v. Martinez, 79SA66
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1979
    ...challenging the sufficiency of the evidence serves little purpose and is rarely productive of any precedential value." People v. Berry, Colo., 598 P.2d 1044 (1979). See also People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 (1971). This case is no exception, especially in light of the fact t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT