People v. Billups, 2008-00669.

Decision Date02 June 2009
Docket Number2008-00669.
Citation2009 NY Slip Op 04435,63 A.D.3d 750,881 N.Y.S.2d 445
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BILLUPS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the defendant contends that he was improperly found to have violated the plea agreement because the sentencing court failed to hold a hearing with respect to the circumstances surrounding his discharge from the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime program, that contention is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant did not request a hearing or move to withdraw his plea (see People v Covington, 28 AD3d 575 [2006]; see also People v Kitchens, 46 AD3d 577 [2007]; People v Garner, 18 AD3d 669 [2005]). In any event, since the defendant failed to dispute the fact that he was discharged from the program or the circumstances which led to that discharge, the County Court was not obligated to conduct a more formal inquiry than it did here (see People v Chiclana, 21 AD3d 823 [2005]; see also People v Huggins, 45 AD3d 1380 [2007]). Moreover, since the defendant pleaded guilty with the express understanding that if he failed to successfully complete the program, the court would impose the enhanced sentence of which he now complains, he has "no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive" (People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; see People v Martinez, 286 AD2d 447 [2001]; People v Allen, 269 AD2d 534 [2000]).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, COVELLO, ENG and HALL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Timberlake
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 22, 2011
    ...and, in any event, without merit ( see People v. Valencia, 3 N.Y.3d 714, 715–716, 786 N.Y.S.2d 374, 819 N.E.2d 990;People v. Billups, 63 A.D.3d 750, 881 N.Y.S.2d 445;People v. Andrews, 62 A.D.3d 1237, 1239, 877 N.Y.S.2d 812;People v. Garner, 18 A.D.3d 669, 670, 795 N.Y.S.2d 336). The defend......
  • People v. Cousar, 2012-04861
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 6, 2015
    ...a more formal inquiry than it did here (see People v. Valencia, 3 N.Y.3d 714, 786 N.Y.S.2d 374, 819 N.E.2d 990 ; People v. Billups, 63 A.D.3d 750, 881 N.Y.S.2d 445 ), since the defendant's plea of guilty to assault in the first degree established the reliability and accuracy of the court's ......
  • People v. Knee
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 10, 2019
    ...further inquiry into the matter (see People v. Shih–Siang Shawn Liao, 103 A.D.3d 757, 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447 ; People v. Billups, 63 A.D.3d 750, 750, 881 N.Y.S.2d 445 ; People v. Huggins, 45 A.D.3d 1380, 1380, 845 N.Y.S.2d 609 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes ......
  • People v. O'Neill
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 30, 2010
    ...or move to withdraw his plea ( see 76 A.D.3d 1144People v. Stubbs, 75 A.D.3d 664, 664-665, 905 N.Y.S.2d 678 [2010]; People v. Billups, 63 A.D.3d 750, 881 N.Y.S.2d 445 [2009], lv. denied 13 N.Y.3d 834, 890 N.Y.S.2d 450, 918 N.E.2d 965 [2009] ). In any event, as defendant admitted that he fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT