People v. Black

Decision Date29 March 1968
Docket NumberCr. 13250
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald BLACK, Defendant and Appellant.

Sanford Levenberg, Los Angeles, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for defendant and appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Frederick R. Millar, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.

FOURT, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of burglary.

In an information filed in Los Angeles on August 4, 1966, defendant was charged with a codefendant with burglarizing a building on July 13, 1966. It was further charged that at the time of the commission of the offense, the defendants were armed with a deadly weapon, namely a .38 caliber revolver. By stipulation the cause was submitted upon the testimony contained in the transcript of the preliminary hearing together with certain exhibits. Each of the defendants was found guilty as charged and the degree was fixed as second degree. The defendants were found to be unarmed. Black was sentenced to the state prison. A timely notice of appeal was filed.

A resume of some of the facts is as follows: Officers Mills and Roost were on patrol duty at about 11:05 p.m. July 13, 1966, when they had occasion to go to an address on Lankershim Boulevard in North Hollywood. When they arrived at the front of the store they saw that the plate glass window to the left of the front door was shattered and that a piece of lumber about 2 4 3 feet in length was lying among the broken glass.

Mills made his way through certain displayed revolver holsters and belts in the store window, entered the main part of the store and walked to a gun showcase where he noticed that the glass had been broken and several guns had been taken. Upon retracing his steps, Mills noticed a box containing several guns on a display stand. Mills exited from the building through the broken window, called to Roost to bring a shotgun and come with him to join in a search of the building. As the officers stepped into an aisleway between the display racks in the store they came upon Black standing with his hands in the air. Black was then handcuffed, and taken to the police car where a search revealed two boxes of ammunition in his pants pockets. Mills told Black of his constitutional rights as of that date and Black replied, 'I know, I know.'

Black related that he had a 'beef' with a man in a bar and that he was getting an 'equalizer'; that he had walked to the store and had broken out the window.

Other officers were called to assist and the codefendant Ortega was found in the store squatting under some raingear. Two guns were removed from the waistband of his trousers. Mills found the gun used by Black, which was one of the guns missing from the case, cocked and loaded with ammunition, about two feet away from where Black was first observed.

Later at a police station Black said that he had a loaded gun and had drawn a bead on the first officer who had entered the store, but had not shot because he did not know whether he had .38...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 2 d3 Abril d3 1969
    ...the preliminary examination or at the trial. Accordingly, defendant is precluded from raising this issue on appeal. (People v. Black, 260 Cal.App.2d 646, 67 Cal.Rptr. 360; People v. Castro, 257 Cal.App.2d 643, 65 Cal.Rptr. 62; People v. Whetstine, 257 Cal.App.2d 256, 64 Cal.Rptr. 775; Peopl......
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 31 d5 Julho d5 1970
    ...right to urge it is deemed to have been waived. (In re Dennis M., 70 Cal.2d 444, 462, 75 Cal.Rptr. 1, 450 P.2d 296; People v. Black, 260 Cal.App.2d 646, 648, 67 Cal.Rptr. 360.) The judgment is affirmed. GERALD BROWN, P.J., and COUGHLIN, J., concur. 1 See Bein, Implementation of Kellett's Co......
  • People v. Smith, Cr. 7108
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 13 d1 Janeiro d1 1969
    ...introduction of the statements at trial and for this reason is also precluded from now raising this issue on appeal. (People v. Black, 260 A.C.A. 684, 686, 67 Cal.Rptr. 360; People v. Whetstine, 257 A.C.A. 282, 284, 64 Cal.Rptr. 775; People v. Castro, 257 A.C.A. 736, 739--740, 65 Cal.Rptr. ......
  • People v. Kilborn
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 22 d5 Maio d5 1970
    ...grounds. The objection is deemed to have been waived, and appellant is precluded from raising the issue on appeal. (People v. Black, 260 Cal.App.2d 646, 648, 67 Cal.Rptr. 360; People v. Brown, 271 Cal.App.2d 391, 395--396, 76 Cal.Rptr. 568; In re Dennis M., 70 Cal.2d 444, 462, 75 Cal.Rptr. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT