People v. Bonney

Decision Date21 January 2010
Docket Number102127
Citation2010 NY Slip Op 407,894 N.Y.S.2d 192,69 A.D.3d 1116
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONNELL BONNEY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
69 A.D.3d 1116
894 N.Y.S.2d 192
2010 NY Slip Op 407
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
DONNELL BONNEY, Appellant.
102127
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Decided January 21, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered July 31, 2008, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree.

KAVANAGH, J.


Defendant and the victim have been involved in a long-term relationship that has been characterized by numerous assaults and other acts of violence. On September 21, 2007, the victim, upon returning home after spending an evening with friends, received a telephone call from defendant in which he told her

69 A.D.3d 1117

that she "better watch [her]self." Shortly after that phone call, defendant, apparently enraged at the prospect that another adult male might be in the house, forced his way into the victim's home, grabbed her by the hair, put a knife to her throat and repeatedly hit her head against the floor and kitchen countertop. He dragged the victim throughout the premises, apparently in search of her male companion, and choked her until she became momentarily unconscious. At one point during the encounter, defendant grabbed a photograph of one of the victim's children and told her that she "was never going to see [her] kids again." The attack continued unabated until the parties' 10-year-old son came into the home and saw defendant on top of the victim strangling her. Defendant, upon seeing his son, spit on the victim and fled. After 911 was called, the victim was taken to the hospital where bruises and abrasions were noted about her head and face and she was found to have sustained a fracture to her thyroid cartilage. She also reported having difficulty with her vision as well as her hearing and claimed to have sustained some loss of memory.

Defendant was subsequently charged by indictment with, among other things, attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree.* At trial he was convicted of these five charges and sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate prison term of 24 years, plus five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

Initially, defendant contends that his conviction for attempted murder is not supported by the weight of the credible evidence because it was never established at trial that, at any time during the encounter, he intended to kill the victim as opposed to simply intending to assault her. While conceding that he forced his way into the victim's home, defendant argues that his actions that evening did not amount to conduct that came "dangerously near" to causing the victim's death and did not support the jury's verdict convicting him of attempted murder (People v Acosta, 80 NY2d 665, 670 [1993]; see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]; People v Naradzay, 11 NY3d 460, 466 [2008]). Specifically, defendant claims that the entire encounter was prompted by his concern for the victim's safety and that he only became angry and agitated once inside the premises

69 A.D.3d 1118

because he believed that the victim had been entertaining a male visitor. He admits grabbing the victim by her hair, assaulting her and placing his hands about her neck, but denies ever harboring an intent to kill her. He also argues that the victim's prompt discharge from the hospital on the evening of the attack is evidence that she was not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • People v. Malcolm
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 10, 2010
    ...We disagree. A defendant's intent may be inferred from his actions and the surrounding circumstances ( see People v. Bonney, 69 A.D.3d 1116, 1118, 894 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2010], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 838 [2010]; People v. Nash, 64 A.D.3d 878, 881, 883 N.Y.S.2d 333 [2009]; People v. Booker, 53 A.D.......
  • People v. Molina
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 16, 2010
    ...actions and the surrounding circumstances ( see People v. Malcolm, 74 A.D.3d 1483, 1484, 902 N.Y.S.2d 264 [2010]; People v. Bonney, 69 A.D.3d 1116, 1118, 894 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2010], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 838, 901 N.Y.S.2d 145, 927 N.E.2d 566 [2010] ), we find that the verdict convicting defenda......
  • People v. McCloud
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 23, 2014
    ...because it means to kill by choking, the terms strangling and choking are often used interchangeably (see e.g. People v. Bonney, 69 A.D.3d 1116, 1117, 894 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2010], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 838, 901 N.Y.S.2d 145, 927 N.E.2d 566 [2010] ), and the Penal Law does not require death to pr......
  • People v. Andrews
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 4, 2010
    ...could justifiably conclude that he came "dangerously near" to causing serious physical injury to the victim ( People v. Bonney, 69 A.D.3d 1116, 1117, 894 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2010], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 838, 901 N.Y.S.2d 145, 927 N.E.2d 566 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted] )......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT