People v. Boyd
| Decision Date | 13 August 2015 |
| Docket Number | Court of Appeals No. 12CA2607 |
| Citation | 395 P.3d 1128 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Pamela Kathleen BOYD, Defendant–Appellant. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
People v. Knobee
...do not believe that every comment made by a trial court to the jury panel during voir dire is automatically an instruction."); People v. Boyd , 2015 COA 109, ¶ 12, 395 P.3d 1128 (opining that the court's comments during voir dire discussions were not an instruction), aff'd , 2017 CO 2, 387 ......
-
People v. Godinez
...of the first line of cases in the majority opinion and the analysis of the second line of cases in the dissent); see also People v. Boyd , 2015 COA 109, 395 P.3d 1128 (same), aff’d , 2017 CO 2, 387 P.3d 755.¶ 106 Stellabotte II resolved this conflict and affirmed the Thomas Rule and this co......
-
People v. Stellabotte
...divisions of our court have considered whether amendments that are silent as to their effective dates apply retroactively. See People v. Boyd , 2015 COA 109, ¶ 14, 395 P.3d 1128, 1132 (concluding that although Amendment 64 does not indicate a clear intent for retroactive application, it app......
-
People v. Tibbels
...do a better job of explaining reasonable doubt. Thus, in our view, the illustration was unlike a formal instruction of law. See People v. Boyd , 2015 COA 109, ¶ 12, 395 P.3d 1128 (opining that the court's comments during voir dire were not an instruction), aff'd , 2017 CO 2, 387 P.3d 755 ; ......
Request a trial to view additional results