People v. Carr
Decision Date | 12 December 2005 |
Docket Number | 2004-02876. |
Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 09555,24 A.D.3d 566,806 N.Y.S.2d 683 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ADRIAN CARR, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
After a lawful stop of the defendant's vehicle (see People v. Ingle, 36 NY2d 413, 414-415 [1975]; People v. Edwards, 222 AD2d 603, 604 [1995]), the actions by the arresting officer which led to the discovery of the gun were minimally intrusive (see People v. Vasquez, 106 AD2d 327, 329 [1984], affd 66 NY2d 968 [1985], cert denied 475 US 1109 [1986]; see also Matter of William S., 13 AD3d 189 [2004]), reasonable to control the scene (see People v. Forbes, 283 AD2d 92, 96 [2001]), and reasonably related in scope and intensity to the circumstances (see People v. O'Neal, 248 AD2d 561 [1998]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly allowed the gun into evidence.
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carr v. Berbary
...related in scope and intensity to the circumstances," and that "defendant's remaining contention is without merit." People v. Carr, 24 A.D.3d 566, 567 (2d Dep't 2005) (internal citations omitted). Petitioner sought leave to appeal and was denied by the Court of Appeals on February 24, 2006.......
-
People v. Carr
...N.E.2d 1281 6 N.Y.3d 810 PEOPLE v. CARR. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. February 24, 2006. Appeal from 2d Dept.: 24 A.D.3d 566, 806 N.Y.S.2d 683 Application for leave to appeal—criminal— Denied. (Rosenblatt, J.). ...
- People v. Brown