People v. Castrechino

Decision Date10 November 1987
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard CASTRECHINO, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Edward J. Nowak by Howard Broder, Rochester, for appellant.

Howard R. Relin by Michael Nelson, Rochester, for respondent.

Before DENMAN, J.P., and GREEN, BALIO, LAWTON and DAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him of coercion and unlawful imprisonment arising out of his abduction and rape of his former girl friend, defendant contends that the court erroneously admitted evidence of defendant's prior violent acts against the same victim; that the court erred in permitting the prosecutor to ask a defense witness whether defendant had given money to the witness' husband; and that he was deprived of a fair trial by comments made by the prosecutor upon summation.

The proof of defendant's prior acts of violence against his former girl friend were admissible to show his intent and motive in committing the charged crimes (see, People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 886, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 507 N.E.2d 1104; People v. Norman, 118 A.D.2d 597, 499 N.Y.S.2d 14, lv. denied 60 N.Y.2d 1055, 504 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 495 N.E.2d 364; cf., People v. Washpun, 134 A.D.2d 858, 521 N.Y.S.2d 915 [1987] ).

The court did not err in permitting the People to ask a defense witness if defendant had given her husband money on the morning of her testimony. A witness may be examined concerning any fact bearing on her credibility. The witness' awareness of defendant's payment to her husband was relevant to the issue of her interest or bias in the case. The prosecution's good faith for making that inquiry was demonstrated by its readiness to call a Deputy Sheriff who had witnessed the payment.

Finally, the prosecutor's remarks on summation were fair response to the comments of defense counsel and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Banks, 124 A.D.2d 1064, 508 N.Y.S.2d 962, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 824, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1030, 506 N.E.2d 541, cert. denied, 484 U.S. 834, 108 S.Ct. 111, 98 L.Ed.2d 70; People v. Street, 124 A.D.2d 841, 508 N.Y.S.2d 558, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 834, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1042, 506 N.E.2d 553).

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Wright
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 Noviembre 1990
    ...People v. Willsey, 148 A.D.2d 764, 538 N.Y.S.2d 342, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 749, 545 N.Y.S.2d 124, 543 N.E.2d 767; People v. Castrechino, 134 A.D.2d 877, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 1005, 526 N.Y.S.2d 939, 521 N.E.2d 1082). Moreover, the court properly gave limiting instructions to......
  • People v. Robinson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 15 Marzo 1993
    ...142; People v. Wright, 167 A.D.2d 959, 562 N.Y.S.2d 301; People v. Willsey, 148 A.D.2d 764, 538 N.Y.S.2d 342; People v. Castrechino, 134 A.D.2d 877, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960), especially in view of the defendant's position at the trial that he had struck the complainant by accident (see, People v. ......
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Julio 1997
    ...52 N.Y.2d 350, 359, 438 N.Y.S.2d 261, 420 N.E.2d 59; People v. Robinson, 191 A.D.2d 595, 594 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Castrechino, 134 A.D.2d 877, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 1005, 526 N.Y.S.2d 939, 521 N.E.2d 1082; People v. Griffin, 126 A.D.2d 743, 511 N.Y.S.2d 136, lv. denied 6......
  • People v. Rolf
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Julio 1992
    ...52 N.Y.2d 350, 438 N.Y.S.2d 261, 420 N.E.2d 59; People v. Henson, 33 N.Y.2d 63, 349 N.Y.S.2d 657, 304 N.E.2d 358; People v. Castrechino, 134 A.D.2d 877, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 1005, 526 N.Y.S.2d 939, 521 N.E.2d 1082; People v. Dyes, 122 A.D.2d 69, 504 N.Y.S.2d The jury's ver......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The whole truth: restoring reality to children's narrative in long-term incest cases.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 87 No. 4, June 1997
    • 22 Junio 1997
    ...are used to show motive and intent. See People v. Linderberry, 626 N.Y.S.2d 876, 878-79 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995); People v. Castrechino, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960, 961 (N.Y. Div. 1987). In incest cases, where force is not a statutory element of the offense and where identity is not disputed, neither of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT