People v. Roides

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationPeople v. Roides, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, 124 A.D.2d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Decision Date10 November 1986
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven William ROIDES, Appellant.

Herbert Greenman, Buffalo, for appellant.

Howard R. Relin, by Joan Psaila, Rochester, for respondent.

Before DILLON, P.J., and DENMAN, GREEN, PINE and BALIO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM.

In this prosecution for arson and assault, the court properly received evidence of defendant's prior uncharged crimes and bad acts on the People's case in chief. Evidence of prior uncharged crimes is admissible if it is directly probative of some issue in the case (People v. Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350, 359, 438 N.Y.S.2d 261, 420 N.E.2d 59; People v. Vails, 43 N.Y.2d 364, 368, 401 N.Y.S.2d 479, 372 N.E.2d 320). Here, the evidence established that defendant had smashed his wife's car windows; slashed her tires; broke two windows on the house in which she was living; threatened to give her a "good beating," to cut her throat, and to put her and her friends in their graves. Thus, the evidence of defendant's threats and acts of violence toward his wife in the month preceding the crime was directly probative of his intent to set fire...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • People v. Putnam
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 30, 1987
    ...that the objectionable portion was probative of the issue of intent and outweighs any prejudice to defendant (see, People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 886, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 507 N.E.2d 1104; People v. Lawson, 124 A.D.2d 853, 508 N.Y.S.2d 623, lv. denied......
  • People v. Carey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 20, 1989
    ...where, as here, it is relevant on the issue of intent (see, People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 293, 61 N.E. 286; People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 886, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 507 N.E.2d Judgment unanimously affirmed. ...
  • People v. Kaufman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 26, 1989
    ...People v. Norman, 118 A.D.2d 597, 499 N.Y.S.2d 14; see also, People v. Castrechino, 134 A.D.2d 877, 521 N.Y.S.2d 960; People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826). There was nothing particularly uncommon or unique about the scene of the crime and it was reasonable for the Trial Justi......
  • People v. Castrechino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 10, 1987
    ...against his former girl friend were admissible to show his intent and motive in committing the charged crimes (see, People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 886, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 507 N.E.2d 1104; People v. Norman, 118 A.D.2d 597, 499 N.Y.S.2d 14, lv. denied......
  • Get Started for Free