People v. Chattaway

Decision Date31 July 1969
Docket NumberNo. 1,Docket No. 6150,1
Citation171 N.W.2d 801,18 Mich.App. 538
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff, v. Percival J. CHATTAWAY, Defendant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Dominick R. Carnovale, Detroit, for plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Luvenia D. Dockett, Asst. Pros. Atty., Wayne County, Detroit, for defendant.

Before FITZGERALD, P.J., and LEVIN and T. M. BURNS, JJ.

LEVIN, Judge.

The defendant was convicted on a plea of guilty of the crime of conspiring to utter and publish a false instrument. 1 He appeals on leave granted from an order denying his petition for clarification of his sentence. He claims that he was improperly denied credit for the time he spent in the county jail awaiting trial. In response, the people argue that the defendant received credit for the time he was in jail against the sentence imposed in another case and he is not entitled to 'duplicate' credit against the sentence imposed in this case.

The relevant facts are:

                                               This Case                Other Case
                                      ---------------------------  --------------------
                Charge                (1) conspiracy to utter      uttering and
                                          and publish, and         publishing
                                      (2) uttering and publishing
                Arraignment
                on complaint              1/19/66                      1/15/66
                Examination               2/16/66                      2/10/66
                                          2/18/66
                Arraignment on
                information               4/6/66                       3/3/66
                Plea of guilty            8/8/66                       7/7/66
                                      (plea to conspiracy          (plea to attempt to
                                      to utter and publish)        utter and publish)
                Date of sentence          9/6/66                       7/22/66
                Sentence                  4 1/2 to 5 years             2 1/2 to 5 years
                Provision concerning      "Given credit for        "To be given credit
                credit for time           time served in           for time served in
                served awaiting           Wayne County Jail."      Wayne County Jail
                trial in the order                                 6 months."
                of conviction and
                sentence or in
                the mittimus
                

In both cases at the conclusion of each appearance (preceding sentence) by the defendant in court, the judge set bond at $1,000; however, bond was not set following the August 8, 1966 hearing in this case.

The relevant statute provides:

'Whenever any person is hereafter convicted of any crime within this state and has served any time in jail prior to sentencing because of being denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted, the trial court in imposing sentence shall specifically grant credit against the sentence for such time served in jail prior to sentencing.' M.C.L.A. § 769.11b (Stat.Ann.1969 Cum.Supp. § 28.1083(2)).

Our Court has held that a statement by a trial judge while sentencing a convicted person that he took into consideration the time the convicted person spent in jail awaiting trial does not comply with the requirements of this statute. Booker v. Judge of Recorder's Court (1967), 7 Mich.App. 705, 709, 153 N.W.2d 178; People v. Grandahl (1969), 16 Mich.App. 221, 224, 225, 167 N.W.2d 802.

'The required specific grant of credit cannot be accomplished by the trial court stating he has considered the time spent in jail in arriving at the sentence pronounced nor by a statement that defendant has been given credit for such time. It must appear from the record that such specific grant of credit was made and the manner in which it was made. For example, the sentence of (the defendant) would comply with the act if the trial judge had fixed the date of commencement of sentence as the date (the defendant) was jailed for the offense which led to that sentence, or if after pronouncing sentence, the trial court had stated defendant was to receive 8 months credit against the sentence.' Booker v. Judge of Recorder's Court, Supra, 7 Mich.App. p. 709, 153 N.W.2d p. 180.

In Michigan, with exceptions not here relevant, 2 a sentence may not be imposed to commence upon completion or expiration of another sentence. In re Carey (1964), 372 Mich. 378, 380, 126 N.W.2d 727.

In the absence of the quoted statutory provision one convicted following a trial and sentenced for precisely the same term as one convicted upon a plea of guilty would be made to serve a longer time in jail, I.e., the time spent awaiting trial. 3 Thus, this statutory provision avoids unnecessary chilling of exercise of the right to trial.

This statutory provision is remedial and should be liberally construed to effectuate the salutary purposes sought to be achieved by the legislature in its enactment. People v. Havey (1968), 11 Mich.App. 69, 160 N.W.2d 629. 4 Cf. Booker v. Judge of Recorder's Court, Supra. The construction of the statute which the people seek is in conflict with the legislative purpose as that construction would chill exercise of the right to trial by an accused person who, like the defendant, faces more than one untried charge.

The statute states that one who serves time in jail awaiting trial because he is 'denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted' is entitled to the sentence credit. In this case, before the defendant pled guilty he was 'unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he (was) convicted' although it was set at a relatively low amount--$1,000. After he pled guilty, the defendant was 'denied' bond.

The statute does not make the convicted person's right to sentence credit dependent on the reason why bond was denied or, if bond is set, the reason why he was unable to furnish bond. The fact that the defendant may have been unable to furnish bond in this case because even if he did so he might not have been released...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • People v. Hall, Docket No. 3902
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • August 28, 1969
    ...sentences still not fully served imposed upon the defendant following earlier convictions for other offenses. 5 In People v. Chattaway (1969), 18 Mich.App. ---, 171 N.W.2d 801, our Court observed that in Michigan, with exceptions not here relevant, a sentence may not be imposed to commence ......
  • People v. Coyle
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 17, 1981
    ...23 Mich.App. 510, 513, 179 N.W.2d 22 (1970), People v. Face, supra, at 439, 276 N.W.2d 916. Moreover, in People v. Chattaway, 18 Mich.App. 538, 542, 171 N.W.2d 801 (1969), this Court also noted that the statute "avoids unnecessary chilling of exercise of the right to trial" by crediting tim......
  • People v. Prieskorn
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1986
    ...whatever the reason, and whether related or unrelated to the crime for which the sentence in issue is imposed, People v. Chattaway, 18 Mich.App. 538, 543, 171 N.W.2d 801 (1969); the middle or intermediate approach that asks the question whether the reason for the presentence confinement bea......
  • People v. Clark
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 25, 1972
    ...379 (1970).3 M.C.L.A. § 750.360; M.S.A. § 28.592.4 In re Carey, 372 Mich. 378, 380, 126 N.W.2d 727 (1964); People v. Chattaway, 18 Mich.App. 538, 541, 171 N.W.2d 801 (1969).5 People v. Kuhn, 67 Mich. 463, 35 N.W. 88 (1887); Cf. People v. Williams, 9 Mich.App. 676, 158 N.W.2d 42 (1968); 1 Wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT