People v. Chmielewski, 26620

Decision Date06 January 1975
Docket NumberNo. 26620,26620
Citation529 P.2d 1337,187 Colo. 268
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. CHMIELEWSKI, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., James R. Gmelin, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the District Attorney of Pueblo County stems from a ruling of the district court setting aside a verdict of guilty returned by a jury.

Not a single question of law is raised by the brief for the People. The action of the court was grounded on a finding of insufficient identity of goods allegedly the subject of a theft charge against the defendant. The prosecution would have us review this ruling in spite of Colo.Sess. Laws 1972, ch. 44, 39--12--102 at 253, which permits the prosecution to appeal on only questions of law.

The appeal is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Ayala, 87SA187
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1989
    ...See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 The basis for an appeal by the prosecution in a criminal case is to ......
  • People v. Thompson, 81SA435
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1982
    ...See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 In our view, however, the district court overlooked or ignored secti......
  • People v. Lyle, 79SA22
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1980
    ...precedential value. People v. Martinez, Colo., 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, Colo., 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 II. The People next challenge the appropriateness of the admission i......
  • People v. Tharp
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1987
    ...held that the prosecution will be limited in its appeals under this section to "only questions of law." People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 269, 529 P.2d 1337, 1338 (1975) (interpreting ch. 44, sec. 1, § 39-12-102, 1972 Colo.Sess.Laws 190, 253, a predecessor of the current section 16-12-1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • From the Wool-sack
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 7-6, June 1978
    • Invalid date
    ...at Pueblo were indicted by the grand jury for malfeasance in office. 2. People v. Samora, 532 P.2d 946 (1975). 3. People v. Chmielewski, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975). 4. People v. Mussel, 561 P.2d 1259 (1977). 964 965 966 967 (c) 1978 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Res......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT