People v. Chmielewski, 26620
Decision Date | 06 January 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 26620,26620 |
Citation | 529 P.2d 1337,187 Colo. 268 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. CHMIELEWSKI, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., James R. Gmelin, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.
No appearance for defendant-appellee.
This appeal by the District Attorney of Pueblo County stems from a ruling of the district court setting aside a verdict of guilty returned by a jury.
Not a single question of law is raised by the brief for the People. The action of the court was grounded on a finding of insufficient identity of goods allegedly the subject of a theft charge against the defendant. The prosecution would have us review this ruling in spite of Colo.Sess. Laws 1972, ch. 44, 39--12--102 at 253, which permits the prosecution to appeal on only questions of law.
The appeal is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ayala, 87SA187
...See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 The basis for an appeal by the prosecution in a criminal case is to ......
-
People v. Thompson, 81SA435
...See People v. Martinez, 198 Colo. 577, 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, 198 Colo. 258, 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 In our view, however, the district court overlooked or ignored secti......
-
People v. Lyle, 79SA22
...precedential value. People v. Martinez, Colo., 603 P.2d 944 (1979); People v. Berry, Colo., 598 P.2d 1044 (1979); People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975); People v. Kirkland, 174 Colo. 362, 483 P.2d 1349 II. The People next challenge the appropriateness of the admission i......
-
People v. Tharp
...held that the prosecution will be limited in its appeals under this section to "only questions of law." People v. Chmielewski, 187 Colo. 268, 269, 529 P.2d 1337, 1338 (1975) (interpreting ch. 44, sec. 1, § 39-12-102, 1972 Colo.Sess.Laws 190, 253, a predecessor of the current section 16-12-1......
-
From the Wool-sack
...at Pueblo were indicted by the grand jury for malfeasance in office. 2. People v. Samora, 532 P.2d 946 (1975). 3. People v. Chmielewski, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975). 4. People v. Mussel, 561 P.2d 1259 (1977). 964 965 966 967 (c) 1978 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Res......