People v. Colucci
Citation | 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 02978,942 N.Y.S.2d 395,94 A.D.3d 1419 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Randy COLUCCI, Sr., Defendant–Appellant. |
Decision Date | 20 April 2012 |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Kathleen E. Casey, Barker, for defendant-appellant.
Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Thomas H. Brandt of Counsel), for respondent.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1] ). We conclude that defendant's contentions regarding his waiver of the right to challenge the judgment of conviction by motion pursuant to CPL articles 330 and 440 or by writ of coram nobis are premature ( see People v. Hill, 93 A.D.3d 1237, 939 N.Y.S.2d 919, 920). It is settled that the courts of this State may decide only controversies that are presently justiciable. To be justiciable, a controversy must “involve present, rather than hypothetical, contingent or remote, prejudice” to a party ( American Ins. Assn. v. Chu, 64 N.Y.2d 379, 383, 487 N.Y.S.2d 311, 476 N.E.2d 637, appeal dismissed and cert. denied 474 U.S. 803, 106 S.Ct. 36, 88 L.Ed.2d 29). Here, defendant's contentions with respect to such postjudgment relief “seek[ ] merely an advisory opinion” ( Hill, 93 A.D.3d 1237, 939 N.Y.S.2d at 920).
We reject defendant's further contention that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid ( see generally People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). Defendant signed a written waiver of the right to appeal, and the plea colloquy demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal ( see People v. James, 71 A.D.3d 1465, 1465, 898 N.Y.S.2d 391). Further, the record establishes that he “ ‘understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty’ ” ( People v. Dunham, 83 A.D.3d 1423, 1424, 919 N.Y.S.2d 258, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 794, 929 N.Y.S.2d 102, 952 N.E.2d 1097, quoting Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Guantero
...executed a written waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Jones, 96 A.D.3d 1637, 1637, 946 N.Y.S.2d 797;People v. Colucci, 94 A.D.3d 1419, 1420, 942 N.Y.S.2d 395,lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 959, 950 N.Y.S.2d 111, 973 N.E.2d 209). Although the contention of defendant with respect to both appe......
-
Daniel J. v. State
... ... concedes in his appellate brief that he was given "full ... access" to his CNYPC records (see People v ... Colucci, 94 A.D.3d 1419, 1419-1420 [4th Dept 2012], ... lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 1025 [2012]). To the extent that ... petitioner contends that ... ...
- People v. Colucci
-
People v. Colucci
...N.E.2d 209950 N.Y.S.2d 111Peoplev.Randy Colucci 2Court of Appeals of New YorkJune 22, 2012 OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE 4th Dept.: 94 A.D.3d 1419, 942 N.Y.S.2d 395 (Niagara)Graffeo, J. Denied %. 2. Denied, with leave to renew within 30 days after the Court of Appeals renders a decision in Peopl......