People v. DeBerry
| Citation | 73 A.D.2d 652,422 N.Y.S.2d 733 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Larry DeBERRY, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 17 December 1979 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Charles Lavine, Forest Hills, for appellant.
John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Ivan K. Chesler, East Rockaway, of counsel), for respondent.
Before TITONE, J. P., and MANGANO, RABIN and GIBBONS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 6, 1978, convicting him of rape in the first and second degrees, sodomy in the first and second degrees and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a second-felony offender.
Case remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance herewith and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report with all convenient speed.
At the sentencing proceedings following his conviction, defendant was arraigned on a "prior offense information" arising out of a 1962 conviction, by plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree, for which defendant had served more than 10 years in prison. Defendant contended that the documents submitted to prove that conviction were all forgeries, asserted that he was never advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962, and claimed that his counsel was ineffective because he never filed a notice of appeal from that judgment of conviction. The minutes of those proceedings were not submitted to the court. The sentencing court conducted a hearing on the question of whether defendant was the same person who was convicted of the prior offense, and properly refused to entertain defendant's contention that the prior conviction was "unconstitutionally obtained" because his attorney allegedly neglected to file a notice of appeal (see People v. Luciano, 46 N.Y.2d 767, 769, 413 N.Y.S.2d 651, 652, 386 N.E.2d 259, 260). However, pursuant to CPL 400.21, the court should have required proof that defendant was advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962 (see People v. Brown, 67 A.D.2d 949, 413 N.Y.S.2d 218; see, also, People v. Owens, 58 A.D.2d 587, 395 N.Y.S.2d 216). Therefore, we remit to Criminal Term for a hearing on that question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Perkins
...at a second felony offender hearing (CPL 400.21, subd. 7, par. cf. People v. Pruitt, 83 A.D.2d 872, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19; People v. De Berry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733; People v. Brown, 67 A.D.2d 949, 413 N.Y.S.2d 218). In any event, a plea of guilty will be sustained in the absence of a f......
-
People v. Kordresse
...v. Bennett, 86 A.D.2d 674, 446 N.Y.S.2d 381 [1982]; People v. Pruitt, 83 A.D.2d 872, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19 [1981]; People v. De Berry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733 [1979].) Perhaps the most analogous of the cases to the case at bar is Pruitt. There the defendant also was not advised of his rig......
-
People v. Foley
...awareness of the consequences and alternatives available to him (see People v. Brown, 67 A.D.2d 949, 413 N.Y.S.2d 218; People v. De Berry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733; People v. Pruitt, 83 A.D.2d 872, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19; People v. Bennett, 86 A.D.2d 674, 446 N.Y.S.2d 381; People v. Alicea,......
-
People v. Bennett
...nor of the rights that he would be waiving by entering the plea (see People v. Pruitt, 83 A.D.2d 872, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19; People v. DeBerry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733; People v. Brown, 67 A.D.2d 949, 413 N.Y.S.2d 218). Therefore, defendant must be resentenced on the robbery We have consi......