People v. Foley

• Decision Date: 08 August 1983
• Citation: 465 N.Y.S.2d 754,96 A.D.2d 866
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert FOLEY, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 754

465 N.Y.S.2d 754

96 A.D.2d 866

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert FOLEY, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department.

Aug. 8, 1983.

Elaine D. McKnight, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Elizabeth Holtzman, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Barbara D. Underwood, Roseann B. Mackechnie and Jonathan L. Glaser, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.

Before LAZER, J.P., and O'CONNOR, BROWN and RUBIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 18, 1980, convicting him of rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a persistent-felony offender.

Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing as a second-felony offender.

Defendant asserts that he was improperly adjudicated a persistent-felony offender because the two predicate convictions, rendered in 1965 and 1970, respectively, upon his pleas of guilty, were unconstitutionally obtained (see CPL 400.20, subd. 6). Defendant claims that on both occasions, he pleaded guilty without an awareness of the consequences and alternatives available to him (see People v. Brown, 67 A.D.2d 949, 413 N.Y.S.2d 218; People v. De Berry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733; People v. Pruitt, 83 A.D.2d 872, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19; People v. Bennett, 86 A.D.2d 674, 446 N.Y.S.2d 381; People v. Alicea, 89 A.D.2d 872, 453 N.Y.S.2d 241). The minutes of those guilty pleas reveal that defendant was never formally advised, on the record, of his rights pursuant to Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. However, with respect to defendant's 1970 conviction, some reference was made, when he pleaded guilty, to his right to a trial.

The trial court in the instant case held a hearing on defendant's claims. At that hearing, defendant asserted that his counsel on each occasion was ineffective, in failing to advise him of his constitutional rights, and the alternatives available to him. However, defendant appealed from the 1970 judgment of conviction, and, for the purposes of that appeal, was assigned new counsel, who defendant never claimed was ineffective. On that appeal, defendant never contested the validity of his guilty plea, and his conviction was affirmed by this court (see People v. Foley, 38 A.D.2d 688, 328 N.Y.S.2d 379).

There is no evidence in the record that defendant was aware of his rights and the alternatives available to...