People v. Dunbar

Decision Date20 October 2005
Citation840 N.E.2d 106,5 N.Y.3d 834
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Harold L. DUNBAR, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The suppression court, affirmed by the Appellate Division, held that the police did not have a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, as needed in order to engage in the more extended, accusatory questioning attendant to a common-law inquiry. As we held in People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 191-192, 581 N.Y.S.2d 619, 590 N.E.2d 204 [1992], a consent to search will not be upheld unless the request to search is supported by a founded suspicion of criminality (see also People v. Tejeda, 217 A.D.2d 932, 630 N.Y.S.2d 160 [4th Dept.1995]; People v. Carter, 199 A.D.2d 817, 606 N.Y.S.2d 786 [3d Dept.1993]; People v. Alston, 193 A.D.2d 883, 597 N.Y.S.2d 823 [3d Dept.1993]; People v. Boyd, 188 A.D.2d 239, 594 N.Y.S.2d 147 [1st Dept.1993]). Here, as the courts determined, defendant granted the police permission to search his person and his car only after questioning that might reasonably have led him to believe that he was suspected (without a founded suspicion) of criminality.

When, as here, there is support in the record for the lower courts' undisturbed finding as to the lack of a founded suspicion of criminality, our review is at an end.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Perkins
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • August 21, 2017
    ...officer's request to search must be justified by a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot ( People v. Dunbar, 5 N.Y.3d 834, 835, 806 N.Y.S.2d 137, 840 N.E.2d 106 [2005] ).9 A failure to apply this standard would effectively permit police to knock on any door at any time and reque......
  • People v. Davis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 7, 2022
    ...reasonable suspicion, Logue was permitted to ask defendant whether he had any heroin on his person (see People v. Dunbar, 5 N.Y.3d 834, 835, 806 N.Y.S.2d 137, 840 N.E.2d 106 [2005] ; People v. Mueses, 137 A.D.3d 1664, 1665, 27 N.Y.S.3d 309 [2016], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1136, 39 N.Y.S.3d 118, ......
  • People v. Davis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 22, 2017
    ...833, 921 N.Y.S.2d 197, 946 N.E.2d 185 [2011] ) and to ask defendant for his consent to search it (see People v. Dunbar, 5 N.Y.3d 834, 835, 806 N.Y.S.2d 137, 840 N.E.2d 106 [2005] ; People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d at 191–192, 581 N.Y.S.2d 619, 590 N.E.2d 204 ; People v. Whalen, 101 A.D.3d 1167,......
  • People v. Banks
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 16, 2017
    ...983 N.E.2d 259 [2012] ; People v. Devone, 15 N.Y.3d 106, 110, 905 N.Y.S.2d 101, 931 N.E.2d 70 [2010] ; People v. Dunbar, 5 N.Y.3d 834, 835, 806 N.Y.S.2d 137, 840 N.E.2d 106 [2005] ; People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 191, 581 N.Y.S.2d 619, 590 N.E.2d 204 [1992] ; see generally People v. De B......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT