People v. Ellis, 26785
| Decision Date | 18 August 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 26785,26785 |
| Citation | 189 Colo. 242,539 P.2d 132 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Michael ELLIS, III, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., 10th Judicial Dist., William E. Maschal, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.
Darol C. Biddle, Pueblo, for Joseph Michael Ellis, III.
Rollie R. Rogers, Colo. State Public Defender, James F. Dumas, Jr., Chief Deputy State Public Defender, Thomas M. Van Cleave, III, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for William Randall Slaughter, defendant-appellee.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a trial court order suppressing as evidence a quantity of contraband seized by officers of the Pueblo Police Department as the result of a search conducted pursuant to a search warrant. The defendant-appellees, Joseph Michael Ellis, III, Karen Sue Ellis and William Randall Slaughter, are under indictment for possession of over one-half ounce of marijuana (C.R.S.1963, 48--5--2), 1 possession of marijuana for purposes of sale (C.R.S.1963, 48--5--20), 2 and conspiracy to possess a narcotic drug for sale (C.R.S.1963, 40--2--201). 3
On May 23, 1974, the Pueblo police arrested one Jesse Casias for possession of marijuana. The following day Casias was interrogated by members of the police department. On the basis of Casias' statements, the affidavit, which is in question here, was presented to the county court. This affidavit, which was prepared by Officer Lewis C. Andrew, reads in part as follows:
'Casias related that within the past 24 hours he had been on the premises of 2580 Forsythia St., Pueblo, Colorado. At this particular time Casias was in the front room of 2580 Forsythia St., Pueblo, Colorado and bought 2 pounds of marijuana from a party known only to Casias as 'Randy.' Randy told Casias that he, Randy, had more pounds of marijuana to sell to Casias and that he had them in the house; 2580 Foysythia St., Pueblo, Colorado, at this time. Casias stated to the affiant that he observed a quantity of marijuana, besides the 2 pounds he bought, on the premises of 2580 Forsythia St., Pueblo, Colorado within the past 24 hours.
The county court issued a search warrant for the residence stated in the affidavit. The pursuant search resulted in the seizure of a quantity of marijuana and the arrest of the defendants. Prior to trial on the assorted charges related to the defendants' possession of this contraband, the trial court conducted a hearing on the defendants' motion to suppress the evidence seized from the house.
After hearing the testimony offered by both parties, the trial court ordered the evidence suppressed. The court's order was predicated upon extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Specifically, the court found that Casias did not know the address of the defendants' house nor did he know its color or any identifying characteristics. The court also found that Casias did not point out a particular house as belonging to the defendants. Instead, the court found that Casias merely identified a vehicle, which was parked in front of the house mentioned in the affidavit, and which he believed to be owned by the defendant known to him as 'Randy.' More importantly, it was the court's finding that contrary to the statement contained in the affidavit, Casias did not see an additional quantity of marijuana in the defendants' dwelling. Based on these findings, the court made the further finding that the affiant was not justified in asserting as true the statements of the affidavit which Casias contradicted at the hearing.
The role of the law enforcement officer in the search warrant procedure includes furnishing the magistrate with accurate facts and trustworthy information for purposes of enabling the magistrate to determine whether probable cause exists. People v. Brethauer, 174 Colo. 29, 482 P.2d 369 (1971); People v. Schmidt, 172 Colo. 285, 473 P.2d 698 (1970). After the magistrate has made the determination that probable cause exists and has issued a warrant, it...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Unruh
...the burglar to Detective Turner and to the police file card were misleading or flawed by material omissions. In People v. Ellis, 189 Colo. 242, 245, 539 P.2d 132, 135 (1975), we held that "[a]ny statement included in an affidavit for a search warrant known to the affiant to be false, inaccu......
-
State v. Chenoweth
...to Franks and adhered to the state law precedents following Franks. People v. Dailey, 639 P.2d 1068 (Colo. 1982); People v. Ellis, 189 Colo. 242, 539 P.2d 132 (1975). See also State v. Lehnen, 403 So.2d 683 (La.1981); State v. Rey, 351 So.2d 489 (La. 17. Wood does not separately argue that ......
-
People v. Dailey
...196 Colo. 466, 587 P.2d 275 (1978), overruled on other grounds, People v. Bannister, 4 Colo., 619 P.2d 71 (1980); People v. Ellis, 189 Colo. 242, 539 P.2d 132 (1975); People v. Arnold, supra; People v. Malone, 175 Colo. 31, 485 P.2d 499 (1971); People v. Woods, 175 Colo. 34, 485 P.2d 491 Wh......
-
People v. Johnson
...5 Goodwin v. District Court, 196 Colo. 246, 586 P.2d 2 (1978); People v. Parks, 195 Colo. 344, 579 P.2d 76 (1978); People v. Ellis, III, 189 Colo. 242, 539 P.2d 132 (1975). III. In his brief, the defendant asks that this court decide whether the defendant's confession was voluntary in light......
-
Veracity Challenges in Colorado: a Primer
...P.2d 269 (Colo. 1983). 5. Supra, note 1 at 171. 6. Dailey, supra, note 4 at 1073. 7. Winden, supra, note 4 at 2170. 8. People v. Ellis, 189 Colo. 242, 539 P.2d 132, 135 (1975). 9. People v. Woods, 175 Colo. 34, 485 P.2d 491, 492 (1971). 10. The cases are collected in 2 LaFave, Search and Se......