People v. Evans

Decision Date02 May 1994
Citation614 N.Y.S.2d 151,204 A.D.2d 346
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Deborah EVANS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Amy L. Colvin, Halesite, for appellant.

Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Margaret E. Mainusch and Alexis Kriedman, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered February 18, 1993, convicting her of attempted manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision as to whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea prior to sentencing rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610, 559 N.Y.S.2d 40; CPL 220.60[3]. We find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's application to withdraw her plea on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Moreover, the defendant's protestations of innocence and of coercion were refuted by the record (see, People v. Lisbon, 187 A.D.2d 457, 589 N.Y.S.2d 527). The court conducted an extensive inquiry before accepting the defendant's plea to a lesser charge. The defendant acknowledged that she was not coerced into accepting the plea and that the plea was in her best interests. In denying her motion, the court noted that the plea agreement was reached after a review of the People's evidence. The record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty upon the advice of counsel and thereby secured a favorable sentence (see, People v. Simpson, 193 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 967).

The defendant's contentions regarding the Grand Jury proceedings are not properly before the court as she withdrew her motion to dismiss the indictment as part of the plea bargain. In any event, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited the claims raised on appeal (see, People v. Wallace, 188 A.D.2d 499, 591 N.Y.S.2d 60; People v. Gerber, 182 A.D.2d 252, 589 N.Y.S.2d 171).

We find that the defendant effectively waived appellate review of her sentence as part of her plea bargain (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022). The remaining issues raised by the defendant are without merit.

SULLIVAN, J.P., and O'BRIEN, SANTUCCI and HART, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Boehm, 2004 NY Slip Op 50945(U) (NY 8/30/2004)
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 30, 2004
    ...knowingly and intelligently made. See People v. Leviyev, 256 A.D.2d 359, 681 N.Y.S.2d 766 (2d Dept. 1998); People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2d Dept. 1994); People v. Stevens, 193 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 967 (2d Dept. 1993); see also People v. Martin, 227 A.D.2d 416, 642 N......
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 10, 1995
    ...withdraw his guilty pleas. A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151; People v. Pettway, 140 A.D.2d 721, 529 N.Y.S.2d 32), and a guilty plea will be upheld if it was entered knowingly, volunta......
  • People v. Glaudel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 21, 1997
    ...obtained in violation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury (People v. Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821; People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151; see also, People v. Franklin, 232 A.D.2d 577, 648 N.Y.S.2d 986; People v. Glenn, 220 A.D.2d 527, 632 N.Y.S.2d 188; Peopl......
  • People v. Charles
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 16, 1998
    ...the record (see, People v. Brown, --- A.D.2d ----, 675 N.Y.S.2d 555; People v. Sider, 232 A.D.2d 666, 649 N.Y.S.2d 455; People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151). The defendant's claim that he was coerced by his attorney's warning regarding the strength of the prosecution's case is......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT