People v. Figgins
Citation | 661 N.E.2d 156,87 N.Y.2d 840,637 N.Y.S.2d 684 |
Parties | , 661 N.E.2d 156 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andrew FIGGINS, Appellant. |
Decision Date | 30 November 1995 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Supreme Court promised defendant that it would sentence him to 2 1/2 to 5 years and temporarily release him on his own recognizance in exchange for his guilty plea to attempted burglary in the second degree, provided that he (1) return to court for sentencing in six weeks, (2) not get rearrested during that six-week period while the Probation Department conducted its presentence investigation, and (3) cooperate with the Probation Department in that investigation. Supreme Court advised defendant that in the event any one of these three conditions was violated, the court would not be bound by the plea agreement and could sentence him to 7 1/2 to 15 years. Defendant failed to return to court on the scheduled sentencing date and a bench warrant was issued. When defendant was brought into court on the warrant, the People informed the court that defendant had been arrested on two felonies during his presentence release. Supreme Court ordered defendant held without bail pending sentencing. Defendant subsequently moved to withdraw his guilty plea. Supreme Court denied the motion, noting that the colloquy regarding the plea agreement was clear. Supreme Court imposed an enhanced sentence of 3 1/2 to 7 years.
Defendant's failure to appear in court on the scheduled sentencing date constituted a violation of the plea agreement. Therefore, Supreme Court was no longer bound by the plea promise and could properly impose an enhanced sentence (see, People v. Avery, 85 N.Y.2d 503, 507, 626 N.Y.S.2d 726, 650 N.E.2d 384; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 7, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022; People v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Diaz
...and had the right to impose a greater sentence" (People v. Grant, 122 A.D.3d 767, 767, 996 N.Y.S.2d 147 ; see People v. Figgins, 87 N.Y.2d 840, 841, 637 N.Y.S.2d 684, 661 N.E.2d 156 ; People v. Hubbard, 105 A.D.3d 760, 961 N.Y.S.2d 795 ; People v. Marte, 85 A.D.3d 945, 946, 925 N.Y.S.2d 348......
-
People v. Harris
...imposition of an enhanced sentence was proper (see People v. Hicks, 98 N.Y.2d 185, 746 N.Y.S.2d 441, 774 N.E.2d 205 ; People v. Figgins, 87 N.Y.2d 840, 841, 637 N.Y.S.2d 684, 661 N.E.2d 156 ; People v. Mazyck, 117 A.D.3d 1084, 1085, 986 N.Y.S.2d 556 ; People v. Patterson, 106 A.D.3d 757, 96......
-
People v. Anonymous
...provided a legitimate basis for imposing a sentence at variance with the sentence she was promised, the People cite to People v. Figgins, 87 N.Y.2d 840, 637 N.Y.S.2d 684, 661 N.E.2d 156 [1995] and this Court's decision in People v. Buglione, 11 A.D.3d 297, 782 N.Y.S.2d 452 [2004]. These cas......
-
People v. Grant
...the court was no longer bound by the original plea agreement, and had the right to impose a greater sentence (see People v. Figgins, 87 N.Y.2d 840, 841, 637 N.Y.S.2d 684, 661 N.E.2d 156 ; People v. Hubbard, 105 A.D.3d 760, 961 N.Y.S.2d 795 ; People v. Marte, 85 A.D.3d 945, 946, 925 N.Y.S.2d......