People v. Fousse
| Decision Date | 13 November 1990 |
| Citation | 561 N.Y.S.2d 824,167 A.D.2d 416 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Dominique FOUSSE, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Gross and Levin, Elmhurst (Lawrence J. Gross, of counsel), for appellant.
John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Mark Osnowitz and Annette Cohen, of counsel), for respondent.
Before BRACKEN, J.P., and KUNZEMAN, KOOPER and BALLETTA, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), rendered June 1, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
This judgment of conviction emanates from an altercation between the defendant and Donovan Carty, which resulted in the latter's death. On appeal, the defendant does not dispute the fact that he is responsible for Carty's death, but argues that his actions were justified since he was acting in self-defense, and that the People failed to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree.
It is axiomatic that justification is not a defense to the use of deadly physical force unless the actor reasonably believes that another person is about to use deadly physical force against him and he is unable to retreat safely (see, Penal Law § 35.15[2][a]; see also, People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96, 506 N.Y.S.2d 18, 497 N.E.2d 41). The evidence at trial established that following an initial confrontation between Carty and the defendant, the defendant retreated. The defendant thereafter retrieved a shotgun, which he had hidden, and returned to the scene of the initial altercation. Several witnesses testified that at this point, the defendant approached Carty, pointed the gun at his chest and fired a shot. Although there was some indication that Carty had threatened the defendant earlier in the evening, it is undisputed that none of the witnesses, or the defendant, ever observed Carty carrying a weapon. In light of the foregoing, we conclude that there was ample evidence to enable the jury to find that the defendant initiated the incident which caused Carty's death, and was not acting in self-defense at that time (see, People v. Thompson, 125 A.D.2d 511, 509 N.Y.S.2d 423; People v. Reyes, 116 A.D.2d 602, 497 N.Y.S.2d 463). Moreover, the defendant had every opportunity to retreat safely, without resorting to the use of deadly force (see, Penal Law § 35.15[2][a]; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Edwards, 2014–08534
..., 135 A.D.3d 965, 965–966, 22 N.Y.S.3d 907 ; People v. Candelaria , 206 A.D.2d 385, 385–386, 614 N.Y.S.2d 432 ; People v. Fousse , 167 A.D.2d 416, 561 N.Y.S.2d 824 ). The People also adduced legally sufficient evidence that the defendant intended to cause the death of another person (see Pe......
-
People v. Mitchell
...v. McManus, 67 N.Y.2d 541, 545-547, 505 N.Y.S.2d 43, 496 N.E.2d 202; People v. Light, 170 A.D.2d 416, 565 N.Y.S.2d 550; People v. Fousse, 167 A.D.2d 416, 561 N.Y.S.2d 824). Although the defendant shot the victim after the victim first fired several shots into the ground, the defendant fired......
-
People v. Candelaria
...unable to retreat safely (see, Penal Law § 35.15[2][a]; People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96, 506 N.Y.S.2d 18, 497 N.E.2d 41; People v. Fousse, 167 A.D.2d 416, 561 N.Y.S.2d 824; People v. Richardson, 155 A.D.2d 488, 547 N.Y.S.2d 149). The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Pe......
-
People v. Hayes
...unable to retreat safely (see, Penal Law § 35.15[2][a]; People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96, 506 N.Y.S.2d 18, 497 N.E.2d 41; People v. Fousse, 167 A.D.2d 416, 561 N.Y.S.2d 824; People v. Richardson, 155 A.D.2d 488, 547 N.Y.S.2d 149). There was ample evidence in this case that the defendant, after......