People v. Gaines
| Decision Date | 23 February 2006 |
| Docket Number | 7919. |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD GAINES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence disproved defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. During a fistfight, defendant cut his opponent with a box cutter at a time when the opponent was unarmed and was giving defendant no reason to believe that he was using or about to use deadly physical force (see Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v. Marquez, 8 AD3d 588 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 709 [2004]). Although the complainant banged defendant's head against a wall, this came after defendant had already cut the complainant. Furthermore, the evidence established that defendant could have retreated with complete safety.
Defendant's argument concerning the admission of alleged hearsay evidence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find it to be without merit.
There is nothing in the record to indicate that defendant was mentally incompetent at the time of his trial, or that the court should have conducted further competency proceedings, sua sponte, after the psychiatric institution to which defendant had been committed following a prior finding of incompetency certified that he was no longer incapacitated (see CPL 730.30 [2]; 730.60 [2]; see also Pate v. Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]; People v. Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v. Morgan, 87 NY2d 878 [1995]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Manigault
...to defendant's further contention, the People disproved the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Gaines, 26 A.D.3d 269, 270, 812 N.Y.S.2d 11, lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 847, 816 N.Y.S.2d 753, 849 N.E.2d 976 ). Thus, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of assa......
-
People v. Singh
...he knocked the defendant unconscious after being slashed twice in the back of the head and once in the forehead (see People v. Gaines, 26 A.D.3d 269, 270, 812 N.Y.S.2d 11 ).* 153 N.Y.S.3d 612 Moreover, in considering whether the defendant harbored any reasonable belief that Gibson used or w......
-
People v. Singh
...he knocked the defendant unconscious after being slashed twice in the back of the head and once in the forehead (see People v Gaines, 26 A.D.3d 269, 270).[*] Moreover, in considering whether the defendant harbored any reasonable belief that Gibson used or was about to use deadly physical fo......
-
People v. Singh
...he knocked the defendant unconscious after being slashed twice in the back of the head and once in the forehead (see People v Gaines, 26 A.D.3d 269, 270).[*] Moreover, in considering whether the defendant harbored any reasonable belief that Gibson used or was about to use deadly physical fo......